期刊文献+

5岁儿童注意网络的性别差异 被引量:4

Gender difference of attentional network in 5-year old children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察5岁儿童的注意功能是否存在性别差异。方法:选取幼儿园大班儿童70名[其中女童31人,平均年龄(62.5±2.6)月;男童39人,平均年龄(63.3±2.8)月],进行注意网络功能测验(ANT),比较女童和男童在警觉、定向和执行控制功能上的成绩。结果:儿童完成注意网络任务的正确率达到90%以上;男童的警觉网络效应大于女童[(139±54)ms vs.(109±49)ms,P<0.05]。男童与女童在定向网络和执行控制网络的成绩差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:5岁儿童已有充分能力完成注意网络测验,并且5岁男童的警觉功能可能更强。 Objective: To investigate gender differences in the attentional network in 5-year-old children. Methods: A totally of 70 healthy children [31 girls,( 62. 5 ± 2. 6 months old; 39 boys,( 63. 3 ± 2. 8)months old] from the top class of kindergarten were enrolled in the study. A modified version of the Attention Network Test( ANT) was used to assess the attentional networks( alerting,orienting,and executive control). Results:The mean rate of accuracy was higher than 90%. A significant gender difference was found in the alerting network,boys scored higher than girls [( 139 ± 54) ms vs.( 109 ± 49) ms,P 〈0. 05]. No gender difference was found in the orienting or executive control networks( P〉 0. 05). Conclusion: It suggests that 5-year-old children are fully capable of completing the attentional networks test,and the 5-year-old boy' s alert function may be stronger than that of girls.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期710-713,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31470992) 河南大学教育科学学院青年科研基金资助项目(2014-JKJJ-11)
关键词 5岁儿童 注意网络测验 性别差异 警觉功能 5-year old children attentional network test gender difference alerting function
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献83

  • 1Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 1996; 65: 123-167.
  • 2Fillingim RB, Ness TJ. Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24: 485- 501.
  • 3Van Goozen SH, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren LJ, Frijda NH, Van de poll NE. Gender differences in behaviour: activating effects of cross-sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1995; 20: 343-363.
  • 4Kring AM, Gordon AH. Sex differences in emotion: expression, experience, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol1998; 74: 686-703.
  • 5Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identi-fication, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2007; 264: 237-243.
  • 6Ekehammar B, Sidanius J. Sex differences in sociopolitical attitudes: a replication and extension. Br J Soc Psychol1982; 21: 249-257.
  • 7Hines M. Prenatal gonadal hormones and sex differences in human behavior. Psychol Bull 1982; 92: 56-80.
  • 8Geschwind N, Galaburda AM. Cerebrallateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neuro11985; 42: 634-654.
  • 9Reinisch JM, Ziemba-Davis M, Sanders SA. Hormonal contributions to sexually dimorphic behavioral development in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1991; 16: 213-278.
  • 10Merritt P, Hirshman E, Wharton W, Stangl B, Devlin J, Lenz A. Evidence for gender differences in visual selective attention. Personality Individual Diff2007; 43: 597-609.

共引文献11

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部