湛甘泉痛非《老子》——从“生”的角度

Severely Criticism on Laozi by Ganquan——from the Perspective of “Dynamics”

明中叶儒、道、释三教会通风行于思想界,儒门中不乏有人假儒以倡佛、老者。作为明中叶两大硕儒之一的甘泉门下王道迎合此股思潮,假儒以倡老,撰写《老子亿》。为了表明自己的立场,湛甘泉不得不故作姿态,撰《非老子》,非难《老子》。湛甘泉非难《老子》非基于《老子》理论本身,而是基于自己思想宗旨——"生"。从"生"的角度,甘泉批驳了《老子》的"体"、"用"二分枯槁的自然观。

Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism became a social thought trend. There are some Confucian advocated Taoism、Buddhism under the guise of Confucianism. From Ganquan school, as one of two scholars of Ming dynasty, Wangdao catered to the thought trend and compiled Laozi Supposition under the guise of Confucianism. In order to show his position, Ganquan had to posture and write Criticism on Laozi to criticize Laozi Supposition. Such criticism was not based on the theory of Laozi, but based on the purpose of his theory- Dynamics. From the perspective of Dynamics, Ganquan refuted Laozi on the separate of ontology, function, and undynamic natural view