期刊文献+

鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法用于评价化妆品眼刺激性的可行性研究 被引量:7

Research on the Feasibility of Using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay to Evaluate Eye Irritation of Cosmetics
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法(chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay,CAMVA)评价化妆品眼刺激性的可行性,并用改良后的方法对14种市售化妆品进行眼刺激性的评价。方法通过控制样品的浓度、与鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜的接触时间,以及对评价体系的改良,尝试建立一套标准的CAMVA法评价化妆品眼刺激性的方法。结果护肤类产品无刺激性,用后冲洗类、染发类产品的浓度、与鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜的接触时间均与刺激性大小成正比。在3%的浓度下,用后冲洗类产品的最佳接触时间为20 min,体内外试验结果一致性为90%(9/10);染发类产品为5 min,体内外试验结果一致性为100%(2/2)。结合改良后的评价体系可做到刺激性分级,体内外试验结果一致性为用后冲洗类产品80%(8/10),染发类产品50%(1/2)。结论用CAMVA法可以对化妆品的眼刺激性进行评价,但实验条件和判定标准还需进一步优化。 OBJECTIVE Study on the feasibility of using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay to evaluate eye irritation of cosmetics, and evaluating 14 kinds of cosmetics by improved method. METHODS Establish a standard method on eye irritation using CAMVA of cosmetics by controlling exposure time and sample concentration, and improving the evaluation system. RESULTS Skin care products are non-irritating. There was a positive correlation between exposure time, sample concentration and the stimulation intensity of hair dyes and after using rinse-off cosmetics. At 3% concentration, the best exposure time is 20 min for after using rinse-off cosmetics, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test was 90%(9/10), and 5min for hair dyes, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test was 100%(2/2). Irritation can be graded by using the improved evaluation system, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test of after using rinse-off cosmetics was 80%(8/10), and the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test of hair dyes was 50%(1/2). CONCLUSION CAMVA method can be applied to predict eye irritation of cosmetics,but the experimental conditions and evaluation system need to be further refined.
出处 《中国现代应用药学》 CAS CSCD 2017年第8期1158-1162,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
关键词 化妆品 眼刺激 鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法 cosmetic eye irritation chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1费贵书,周明棣.化妆品致眼损伤的临床分析[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2004,18(6):513-514. 被引量:5
  • 2刘清,郭宝岚,治洪,张月.进口化妆品急性眼刺激性试验[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(2):162-162. 被引量:5
  • 3Vinardell MP,Rimbau V,Mitjans M.Potential eye irritation of some "biodegradable" liquid scintillation cocktails determined in vitro.Food Chem Toxicol,2004,42:1287-1290.
  • 4Worth AP,Cronin MT.Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HET-CAM and neutral red uptake tests.In Vitro Mol Toxicol,2001,14:143-156.
  • 5Balls M,Goldberg AM,Fentem JH,et al.The three Rs:the way forward:the report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 11.Altern Lab Anim,1995,23:838-866.
  • 6Bagley DM,Gardner JR,Holland G,et al.Eye Irritation:Updated Reference Chemicals Data Bank.Toxicol In Vitro,1999,13:505-510.
  • 7Luepke NP.Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential.Food Chem Toxicol,1985,25:287-291.
  • 8Kalweit S,Besoke R,Gerner I,et al.A national validation project of alternative methods to the Draize rabbit eye test.Toxicol In Vitro,1990,4:702-706.
  • 9Gilleron L,Coecke S,Sysmans M,et al.Evaluation of the HETCAM-TSA Method as an Alternative to the Draize Eye Irritation Test.Toxicol in Vitro,1997,11:641-644.
  • 10Budai P,Varnagy L.In vitro ocular irritation toxicity study of some pesticides.Acta Vet Hung,2000,48:221-228.

共引文献20

同被引文献52

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部