期刊文献+

高校双语课程教学要素优化配置方法研究——基于学生感知效用的优化方法

A Study on the Optimal Allocation of Teaching Elements of Bilingual Courses in Ordinary Colleges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了提高普通本科院校双语教学质量,尝试将基于顾客感知效用的服务优化方法应用于双语教学的课程要素配置中。文章提出的方法中,首先基于QFD方法对相关课程要素进行权重的比较和确定;其次,运用问卷调查的方法得到学生对各个课程要素的期望水平;最后利用失望理论建立优化模型确定课程授课方案,并以《系统工程》双语课程为例,说明了该方法的可行性与有效性。 In order to improve the quality of bilingual teaching in ordinary colleges,this paper attempts to apply the service optimization method into the allocation of curriculum elements in bilingual teaching. The method of using QFD to weight the curriculum elements is put forward,and then,the students' expectation levels on different elements are acquired by using a questionnaire survey. Moreover,the optimization model has been established according to disappointment theory so that the teaching plan can be determined. Finally,the feasibility and effectiveness of the method are illustrated by the example of the " System Engineering" course.
作者 刘航
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第3期140-144,共5页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
基金 2015年度河南省高等学校双语教学示范课程项目 2013年度郑州航院校级双语教学示范课程项目
关键词 双语教学 课程要素 QFD 失望理论 顾客感知效用 bilingual teaching curriculum elements QFD disappointment theory customer perceived utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1林森,白世国.高师院校学生评价教师教学质量指标体系的研究[J].现代教育科学(高教研究),2004(3):73-77. 被引量:8
  • 2Parasuraman, A., et al. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality [J]. Journal of Retailing. 64, (1), 1988: 12-40.
  • 3Brady, M. K., and Cronin, J. Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach [J]. Journal of Marketing, Volume 65, July 2001:34-49.
  • 4Cronin, J., and Taylor, S. A. SERVPER Versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling Performance-based and Perceptions-minus-exceptions Measurement of Service Quality [J]. Journal of Marketing. Jan 1994:126- 131.
  • 5Dabholkar, P., et al. A Comprehensive Framework for Service Quality: An Investigation of Critical Conceptual and Measurement Issues Through a Longitudinal Study [J]. Journal of Retailing, 76, (2),2000: 139-173.
  • 6Anderson, E. High tech v. high touch: a case study of TQM implementation in higher education [ J ]. Managing Service Quality, Volume 05, Number 2, 1995: 48 - 56.
  • 7Kwan, P.Y.K. Quality indicators in higher education-comparing Hong Kong and China's students [J]. Managerial Auditing Journal. Volume 14, Number 1/2, 1999: 20 - 27.
  • 8Cuthbert, P. F. Managing service quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 2 [J]. Martaging Service Quality.Volume 6, Number 3 , 1996: 31-35.
  • 9Ford,J. B., et al. Importance-performance analysis as a strategic tool for service marketers: the case of service quality perceptions of business students in New Zealand and the USA[J]. The Journal of Services Marketing. Vol. 13, No. 2,1999:171 - 186.
  • 10O'Neill, M. A., and Palmer, A. Importance-performance analysis, a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education [J]. Quality Assurance in Education. Volume 12, Number 1, 2004:39 - 52.

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部