刑事管辖异议的处理模式与未来选择

The Processing Mode and Future Choice of Criminal Jurisdiction Objection

我国刑事诉讼法尚未赋予当事人提出管辖异议的权利,这不仅有别于国际趋势,也与我国的民事、行政诉讼法截然不同。但立法层面的空白并未反映出司法层面的真实面貌,实践中不仅大量存在当事人提出管辖异议的情形,而且一审法院的处理方式不尽统一,具体可以概括为不予回应、书面答复、判决说理和单独裁定四种模式。总体而言,裁判权在管辖异议问题上处于绝对控制的地位,当事人的诉权难以得到最低标准的程序保障,未来的改革仍需克服制度障碍,秉持着两项原则从六个方面予以完善。

Chinaese criminal procedure law has not yet given the parties the right to put forward the jurisdiction objection,which is not only different from the international trend,but also entirely different with our civil procedure law and administrative procedure law. But the blank of the legislation does not reflect the true aspect of the judicature. In practice,a large number of parties have proposed jurisdiction objection,while the processing methods used by the court of first instance are very chaotic,which can be summarized as four modes including no response,written reply,judgment reasoning and separate ruling. In general,the jurisdiction has an absolute control of the jurisdiction objection while the parties＇ right of action can rarely get the minimum standard procedural protection. The future system reform still need to overcome the obstacles and uphold two basic principles to improve itself from six aspects.