不同止血方式治疗产后出血的效果分析

Analysis of Effect of Different Hemostatic Methods in Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage

目的针对不同止血方式治疗产后出血的效果进行分析比较。方法方便选取2013年12月—2016年12月该院收治的100例产后出血产妇,随机分为对照组和研究组,对照组产妇实施宫腔内纱布填塞止血的方法,研究组产妇实施宫腔球囊压迫止血的方法,比较两组产妇止血效果。结果对照组产妇止血时间、治疗时间及治疗24 h后血红蛋白量分别为(21.2±4.4)min、(31.5±5.2)min及(82.5±8.4)m L;研究组产妇止血时间、治疗时间及治疗24 h后血红蛋白量分别为(14.1±2.5)min、(22.1±4.5)min及(101.5±10.2)m L。研究组产妇的止血时间、治疗时间及治疗后24 h血红蛋白量明显优于对照组产妇(P<0.05)。结论宫腔球囊压迫止血的效果要好于宫腔内纱布填塞止血的效果,极大的降低了产妇发生并发症的几率。

Objective To compare the effect of different hemostatic methods in treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Methods Convenient selection 100 cases of delivery women with postpartum hemorrhage in this hospital from December 2013 to December 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, the control group adopted the intrauterine gauze filling, while the research group adopted the intrauterine balloon compression, and the hemostatic effect was compared between the two groups. Results The hemostatic time, treatment time and haemoglobin at 24 h after treatment in the research group were obviously better than those in the control group [(21.2 ±4.4)min,(31.5 ±5.2)min,(82.5 ±8.4)m L vs(14.1 ±2.5)min,(22.1 ±4.5)min,(101.5±10.2)ml](P<0.05). Conclusion The hemostatic effect of intrauterine balloon compression is better than that of intrauterine gauze filling, which can greatly reduce the occurrence probability of complications of delivery women.