期刊文献+

最佳运动耐量训练对慢性心衰病人临床疗效及预后的影响 被引量:30

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察最佳运动耐量训练对老年冠心病心衰病人临床疗效及预后的影响。方法将心功能Ⅱ级~Ⅲ级136例老年冠心病心衰病人随机分为对照组和治疗组,对照组给予单纯西药治疗,治疗组在西药基础上结合最佳运动耐量训练治疗,在治疗1个和2个疗程后,对比两组心功能、心脏储备功能、生活质量和预后。结果治疗组病人心功能、运动耐量、明尼苏达生活质量评分均较对照组明显改善,且以2个疗程效果更佳(P<0.05);心率、再住院率较对照组明显降低(P<0.05)。结论最佳运动耐量训练较单纯西药治疗能够明显提高老年冠心病心衰病人的临床疗效,改善生活质量和预后。
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2017年第16期2022-2025,共4页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
基金 山东省潍坊市卫生局中医药科研计划项目(No.2016YX054)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 1994, 74: 1240-1244.
  • 2Rector T, Kubo S, Cohn J. Patient's self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 1987, 3: 198-209.
  • 3Riegel B, Moser DK, Glaser D, et al. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire: sensitivity to differences and responsiveness to intervention intensity in a clinical population.Nurs Res, 2002, 51: 209-218.
  • 4Middel B, Bouma J, de Jongste M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire(MLHF-Q). Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15: 489-500.
  • 5Ni H, Toy W, Burgess D, et al. Comparative responsiveness of Short-Form 12 and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail, 2000, 6: 83-91.
  • 6Sneed NV, Paul S, Michel Y, et al. Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure.Heart Lung, 200l, 30:332-340.
  • 7Smith RF, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. Functional capacity in heart failure : Comparison of methods for assessment and their relation to other indexes of heart failure. Circulation, 1993, 87(suppl 6): Ⅵ88-Ⅵ93.
  • 8Gorkin L, Norvell NK, Rosen RC, et al. Assessment of quality of life as observed from the baseline data of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial quality-of life substudy.Am J Cardiol, 1993, 71: 1069-1073.
  • 9Cowley AJ, Wiens BL, Segal R, et al. Randomised comparison of losartan vs. Captopril on quality of life in elderly patients with symptomatic heart failure: the losartan heart failure ELITE quality of life substudy. Qual Life Res, 2000, 9: 377-384.
  • 10Alla F, Briancon S, Guillemin F, et al. Self-rating of quality of life provides additional prognostic information in heart failure. Insights into the EPICAL study. Eur J Heart Fail, 2002, 4:337-343.

共引文献203

同被引文献224

引证文献30

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部