期刊文献+

贵州省黔南州中学化学教师评价现状调查 被引量:1

The Investigation of the Teacher Evaluation of the Middle School Chemistry Teachers in Qiannan Prefecture of Guizhou Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用调查法,对贵州省黔南州中学化学教师评价进行调查。调查及分析显示:黔南州中学评价目的主要是奖惩依据,教师专业发展不受重视;评价主体主要为学校各级管理者,教师等的评价主体性被忽略;评价方法以量化为主,质性评价被忽视;评价内容偏重教师效能评价,忽视教师行为和教师素质评价;评价标准区分性不足,不同课程和教师个体的差异体现不足;评价结果以公示为主,少有建设性反馈。针对出现的问题,提出了相应的建议。 The teacher evaluation of the middle school chemistryteachers in Qiannan Prefecture, Guizhou Province is investigatedby the method of questionnaire. The results of the investigationand analysis shows?that the teacher evaluation is mainly the basisfor teachers' rewards or punishments, but pays no attention to theprofessional development of teachers; the evaluation subjects areschool managers at all levels mainly, but not the teachers; quan-titative evaluation is used mostly, however, qualitative evaluationrarely; evaluation emphasizes on teacher effectiveness evaluation,but ignores teachers performance and competence evaluation; e-valuation criteria can not distinguish different courses and teach-ers' individual differences properly; the evaluation results are fewused to be given constructive feedback for teachers. Based onthese, this paper proposes some suggestions for solving theseproblems existing in the teacher evaluation.
作者 邢焰 李家信
出处 《科教文汇》 2017年第26期102-104,共3页 Journal of Science and Education
基金 贵州省教育厅高校人文社会科学研究基地项目"黔南民族地区中学化学教师专业发展质性评价研究"(编号JD2013233)
关键词 黔南州 中学化学教师 教师评价 教师专业发展 Qiannan Prefecture middle school chemistry teach-ers teacher evaluation teacher professional development
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1张忠山.上海市部分中学教师评价现状调查[J].上海教育科研,2006(10):46-48. 被引量:6
  • 2杨宁燕.我国教师评价现状分析及区分性教师评价的启示[J].黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估),2006(9):78-80. 被引量:2
  • 3Shinkfied, A. T. & Stufflebeam, D., Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
  • 4Anderson, L. W. , International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher education (2th ) , Pargamon Press,1995.
  • 5Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J, 'Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance' , In.. "N. Sehmitt, & W. C. Borman (ed.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Pulishers, 1993:71-98.
  • 6Murphy, K. J. & Cleveland, J. N. , Performance appraisal : An organizational perspective, Allyn & Bacon Publishers, 1991.
  • 7Aubrecht, J. D. , Hanna G. S. & Hoyt, D. P. , 'A comparison of high school student ratings of teaching effectiveness with teacher self- ratings: Factor analytic and multrait- multimethod analyses',Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986, 46 (1) : 223-31.
  • 8Wagner, R. B. , Accountability in Education : A Philosophical Inquiry, New York : Routeledge, 1989.
  • 9NcNeil, J. D. , Politics of Teacher Evaluation, In J. Millman (ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation,Beverly Hills : Sage, 1981.
  • 10Duke, D. L. , 'Developing Teacher Evaluation Systems That Promote Professional Growth', Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1990, 4: 131-144.

共引文献111

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部