期刊文献+

晚清同光体之诗学差异

Poetic Difference in Tongguang Style of Late Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 同光体诸公于诗向称"不墨守盛唐",有同声相应之貌。然其诗论家陈衍,赣、闽、浙三派领袖陈三立、郑孝胥、沈曾植于学古路径、宗法对象及诗风取向并皆有异。论学古,陈衍倡三元力主两宋,沈曾植主三关上接六朝。研学理,散原、海藏二人则唐宋兼采,不主一门。论宗法,郑孝胥服膺荆公,陈三立主宗山谷,沈曾植直追颜谢,陈衍则不主一家。论诗风,陈三立之生涩奥衍,郑孝胥之清苍幽峭,沈曾植之沉博奥邃,皆一时作手。诸公诗学有异,正以此内部之差异而能聊慰同调者于诗道之不同期许,从而能广集同道,分其支脉,续其诗法,壮其师从,扩其风韵,共铸古典诗歌之末代辉煌。 Scholars of Tongguang style always claimed that they didn ^ t u cling to the glorious age of Tang dy-nasty^ ,and they seemed to be in agreement with this point. But the poem theoretician Chen Yan, together with Chen Sanli, Zheng Xiaoxu, and Shen Zengzhi, who were respectively the leaders of Gan, Min and Zhe, were all different in the ancient paths where they learned from, the objects they modeled, and the orientation of the poetic styles. When speaking of learning from ancient times, Chen Yanchang advocated the three originations together with South and North Song dynasties, While Shen Zengzhi emphasized the three passes and the Six dynasties. When speaking of academic research, San Yuan and Hai Zang advocated to adopt the theory and style from both Tang and Song Dynasty without any bias for one source. When speaking of patriarchic system, Zheng Xiaoxu ad-mired Jing Gong; Chen Lisan mainly learned from Huang Shangu; Shen Zengzhi pursued Yan and Xie; while Chen Yan advocate to adopt skills from any outstanding poets. When talking of poetic style, Chen Lisan ^ s style was as-tringent and profound; Zheng Xiaoxu ^ s style was clear, remote, and steep; Shen Zengzhi ^ s style was deep, broad and profound; all of them were the famous writers at that time. Although there existed difference in these scholars, it was this difference that may bring comfort to those people who expected differently in poetic styles, and thus peo-ple with the same opinions gathered together, different branches formed at the same time, the poetic methods were inherited, the students and teachers were enlarged, and the charm of articles was expanded, and then these factors contribute to the brilliance of classic poems in the last feudal dynasty.
作者 周洋
机构地区 山东大学文学院
出处 《黄河科技大学学报》 2017年第5期52-58,共7页 Journal of Huanghe S&T University
关键词 同光体 诗学 差异 Tong Guang style poetics difference
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部