循证护理干预在肺功能检查中的应用研究

Research on Application of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention in the Lung Function Examination

目的探究循证护理干预在肺功能检查中的应用价值。方法方便选取2016年1—9月来该院38例进行肺功能检查者为研究对象,将其分为两组,每组19例。对照组实施常规优质护理。观察组患者实施循证护理干预。对两组患者的肺部功能检查状况、患者检查时间以及病患FEF25-75,PEF和FEV-1状况进行观察。结果观察组患者肺部功能正常率为63.16%,对照组为36.84%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者检查时间为(56.9±7.8)min,观察组为(25.8±5.7)min。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。和对照组相比,观察组患者的PEF显著较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组病患的FEF25-75和FEV-1好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于需实施肺部功能检查的患者来讲,进行循证护理,可在最大程度上减少患者的检查时间,提升检查结果的精准性,值得进一步推广使用。

Objective To study the application value of evidence-based nursing intervention in the lung function examination. Methods 38 cases of lung function examiners in our hospital from January 2016 to September 2016 were conveniently selected and divided into two groups with 19 cases in each, the control group adopted the routine excellent nursing, while the observation group adopted the evidence-based nursing intervention, and the lung function examination situation, examination time and FEF25-75, PEF and FEV-1 of patients in the two groups were observed. Results The normal rate of lung function in the observation group and in the control group was respectively 63.16% and 36.84 %,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the examination time in the control group and in the observation group was respectively(56.9±7.8)min and(25.8±5.7)min,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the FEF in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the FEF25-75 and FEV-1 in the observation group were better than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The evidence-based nursing for of patients with lung function examination can reduce the examination time to a largest extent and improve the accuracy of examination results, which is worth further promotion and application.