期刊文献+

针灸配合水针疗法治疗腰痛40例临床分析 被引量:2

Clinical Analysis of Acupuncture and Hydro-acupuncture Therapy in Treatment of 40 Cases with Lumbago
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析对于腰痛患者,实施针灸配合水针治疗的临床效果。方法方便选择2015年1月—2016年1月该院接收的80例腰痛患者为研究样本,将其随机分为2组,每组40例。对照组行针灸治疗,以此为基础,观察组行水针治疗,分析两组患者的临床治疗效果,症状改善时间和治疗满意度情况。结果对照组患者治疗有效率为62.50%,观察组为97.50%。和对照组相比,观察组患者的治疗满意度显著更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。和对照组相比,观察组病患的各个证型临床症状改善时间更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者满意度为87.50%,观察组为97.50%。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论使用针灸联合水针治疗腰部疼痛疾病,安全性强,不良反应少,临床效果好。有利于患者疾病转归,值得进一步在临床治疗中推广使用。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of acupuncture and hydro-acupuncture therapy in treatment of lumbago.Methods 80 cases of lumbago patients admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were convenient selected and divided into two groups with 40 cases in each, the control group adopted the acupuncture therapy, while the observation group adopted the hydro-acupuncture therapy on the basis of the control group, and the clinical treatment effect, symptom improvement time and treatment satisfactory degree were compared between the two groups. Results The treatment effective rate in the control group and in the observation group was respectively 62.50 % and 97.50%, and the treatment satisfactory degree in the observation group was obviously higher The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the clinical symptoms improvement time in the observation group was shorter The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the satisfactory degree in the control group and in the observation group was respectively 87.50 %and 97.50% The difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The safety of acupuncture and hydro-acupuncture therapy in treatment of lumbago is strong with few adverse reactions and good clinical effect, which is conducive to the disease outcome, and it is worth further promotion and application in clinic.
作者 罗进 韩丹
出处 《中外医疗》 2017年第21期169-171,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 针灸 水针 腰部疼痛 治疗效果 Acupuncture Hydro-acupuncture Lumbago Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献52

  • 1邓中甲.方剂学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2004.17.
  • 2侯家玉.中药药理学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2005:101.
  • 3国家食品药品监督管理局.中药新药临床研究指导原则[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:68.
  • 4高学敏.中药学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2003:293.
  • 5国家中药管理局.中药病症诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社.1994:124-137.
  • 6Grant S,Aitchison T,Henderson E,et al.A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales,Borg scales,and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise[J].Chest,1999,116:1208-1217.
  • 7Shirado O,Doi T,Akai M,et al.An outcome measure for japanese people with chronic low back pain:an introduction and validation study of japan low back pain evaluation questionnaire[J].Spine,2007,32:3052.
  • 8Cem, Dane. Banu, Dane. Which Method is More Efficient in Determining Osteoporosis, QUS or DEXA[J]. International journal of en- docrinology and metabolism, 2012, 10 (04) : 642 -643.
  • 9Mahbobe, Azemati Rahebe, Shakerhosseini Azita, etc. Com- parison of the effects of canola oil versus sunflower oil on the biochemical markers of bone metabolism in osteoporosis [ J ]. Journal of research in medical sciences: the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sci- ences, 2012, 17 (12): 1137-1143.
  • 10郑筱萸.中药薪药临床研究指导原则[M].北京:中医药科技出版社,2002:115-119.

共引文献68

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部