与罪刑法定相悖的刑法条文文义探析

An Analysis of the Meaning of the Code of Criminal Law＇ s Articles Contrary to the Legality of Crime and Punishment

《刑法》第101条所表达的规范意旨,与罪刑法定绝对相悖,应当将其否弃。它来源于1979年《刑法》第89条的规定。在1979年《刑法》中它的存在有其合理性,因为在1997年《刑法》出台之前,中国《刑法》法源模式,是采基本刑法典加系列单行刑法决定;但在1997年《刑法》施行后,中国刑法法源采刑法典加刑法修正案模式,辅之以司法解释之扩充机能,取消了生产单行《刑法》这一模式。《刑法》第96条规定的违反国家规定所表达的意义层次中,有与罪刑法定相对相悖成分,应当谨慎。它来源于1979年《刑法》第89条规定中的“法令”,并且承继了1979年《刑法》之前,刑法可与政策相结合使用之实践惯例。尽管它拓展了行政刑法的规模与领地,但应当在违反国家规定中,将违反国家政策、违反决定和命令,与对应的行政违法行为及其处置之间划出明显确定的红线,以防止行政机关在行政执法和行政施政中滥用刑罚,避免给当事人和社会带来不必要的资源损耗且使用无效的制度尴尬。在中国尚未建立对行政法源及实施给予以法律为根据的司法审查制度之现状下,行政刑法的范围只应当限定于违反法律、违反行政法规这一两种类型。因此,应当对《刑法》第96条中规定的行政措施（行政措施如何被违反是需要规范与现实想象力的）、发布的决定和命令予以严格限缩。

The normative intention expressed in Article 101 of the Criminal Law is absolutely contrary to the law of the crime of death. It comes from Article 89 of the Criminal Code. In the 1979 Criminal Law ,its existence has its reason,because before the introduction of the Criminal Law in China, the Chinese Criminal Law source model, is the adoption of the basic Criminal Code plus a series of single-line Criminal Law decision; but after the implementation of 1997 Criminal Law, the Chinese Criminal Law plus the Criminal Law Amendment Model, supplemented by the judicial interpretation of the expansion of the function, the abolition of the production of single-line Criminal Law this model. Article 96 of the Criminal Law in violation of state regulations expressed in the meaning of the level, there is a contrary to the crime of legality, should be cautious. It comes from the ＂ordinances＂ of Act No. 89 of the Criminal Code of 1979, and inherits the practice before the criminal law can be used in conjunction with the policy. Although it extends the size and territory of administrative Criminal Law, it should, in violation of state regulations, violate national policies,violate decisions and orders, and draw a clear red line between the corresponding administrative offenses and their disposition to prevent administration The authorities in the administrative law enforcement and administrative administration abuse of punishment, to avoid the parties and the community to bring unnecessary loss of resources and the use of ineffective system embarrassment. In China, the scope of administrative criminal law should only be limited to violating the law and violating the two types of administrative regulations under the present situation of judicial review system based on legal basis and administrative law. Therefore,the administrative measures （the administrative measures to be violated are required to be normative and realistic imagination） set forth in Article 96 should be strictly limited by the decisions and orders issued.