论上古韵部元音与入声韵尾的清浊——对郑张尚芳先生“韵部元音”以及“入声韵尾清浊”问题的商榷

Archaic Sound of Main Vowel in YUN and Ending of Final of JU SHENG:A Discussion on Professor Zheng-Cheng's Perspective

郑张尚芳先生《谨答陈新雄先生对"诗经的古音学价值"的述评》一文,引起两岸学者对于上古音韵现象诸多讨论,尤以复辅音声母、韵部元音以及入声韵尾三个问题,最为学者所关注。有关复辅音声母部分,李添富先生以为过度强调复辅音声母,并取以建构古音声纽系统,有其危殆;本文则踵继李先生之研究,就韵部元音之拟定与演化关系、入声韵尾清浊性质问题,做更进一步之探讨。深入研析之余,本文以为郑张先生不论在韵母元音之拟定,或入声韵尾之性质探讨,虽然都经双重考察,但下定结论时,或有其主观考虑,因而容有讨论空间。譬如宽式音标符号是否足以呈现字音原貌,因节缩、省略造成之混同问题,亦可再作斟酌;又如在阴阳入三分、入声韵尾不论清浊都属同一音位情况下,有关入声韵尾之拟定,究竟应当遵循趋简模式定为清音,抑或坚持方言调查结果与声母同步取为浊音,也都值得再作深入探究。

Professor Zheng-Cheng＇s article has triggered a heated debate. Combination of several consonants, main vowel in YUN and ending of a final of JU SHENG are the most discussed. This article considers Professor Zheng-Cheng overemphasized on combination of several consonants, and had a subjective perspective on main vowel in YüN and reconstruction of ending of a final. Professor Zheng-Cheng＇s theory requires further discussion.