期刊文献+

汤姆·雷根的内在价值和固有价值 被引量:3

On Tom Reagan's Intrinsic Value and Inherent Value
原文传递
导出
摘要 Intrinsic value和inherent value有着重要的语义区分。在雷根的理论中,具有道德重要性的是inherent value,而非intrinsic value。这是因为,内在价值(intrinsic value)与功利主义紧密地结合在一起,会侵害个体的合法权益。内在价值是个体作为生命主体的必要条件,而生命主体标准又是固有价值(inherent value)的充分条件。然则,固有价值实际上不是主张生命主体的道德权利的充要条件。非人存在没有权利,人类拥有权利也不是因为他们是具备固有价值的生命主体,而在于他们是人。 There is an important semantic distinction between intrinsic value and inherent value. In Reagan's theory, what has moral importance is inherent value, rather than intrinsic value. The reason is that intrinsic value is closely combined with utilitarianism which will violate the legitimate rights and interests of the individuals. Intrinsic value is necessary for individual as subject - of - a - life whose criterion is sufficient for inherent value. Nonetheless, inherent value is actually not sufficient and necessary for the moral rights of subjects - of - a - life. Non - human existence has no rights. The reason that humans have rights is not that they are subjects - of - a - life possessing inherent value, hut that they are humans.
作者 王鹏伟
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期50-54,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 内在价值 固有价值 生命主体 权利 intrinsic value inherent value subject - of - a - life rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献35

  • 1[1]Aldo Leopold,A Sand County Almanac,and Sketches Here and There (New York:Oxford University Press,1949),pp.204,210-11; Aldo Leopold,A Sand County Almanac:With Essays on Conservation from Round River (New York:Ballantine Books,1970),pp.240,247.
  • 2[2]Anthony Weston,"Beyond Intrinsic Value:Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics," Environmental Ethics 7 (1985):321-39.Much of Weston's critique is based on Monroe Beardsley's "Intrinsic Value," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (1965):1-17.
  • 3[3]See Ben A.Minteer,"Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists?" Environmental Ethics 23 (2001):57-75.
  • 4[4]Peter Singer,Animal Liberation:A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals (New York:New York Review,1975).
  • 5[5]Peter Singer and Tom Regan,eds.,Animal Rights and Human Obligations (Englewood Cliffs,N.J.:Prentice Hall,1976).
  • 6[6]Peter Singer,"The Fable of the Fox and the Unliberated Animals," Ethics 88 (1978):122.
  • 7[7]Tom Regan,"Animal Rights,Human Wrongs," Environmental Ethics 2 (1980):99-120; Tom Regan,The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley:University of California Press,1985).
  • 8[8]John Passmore,Man's Responsibility for Nature:Ecological Problems and Western Traditions (London:Duckworth,1974),p.116.
  • 9[9]J.Baird Callicott,"Animal Liberation:A Triangular Affair," Environmental Ethics 2 (1980):311-28.
  • 10[10]Unfortunately,this journal failed after only a few years and was replaced by Between the Species,which itself has not had a very successful publishing history.

共引文献1

同被引文献11

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部