期刊文献+

规制、规范与文化-认知:档案制度的构成要素与关系研究 被引量:10

Standard pattern and culture-Cognition:Study on the constructive factors and the relation of the archival system
原文传递
导出
摘要 制度要素研究理论将制度构成分为规制性要素、规范性要素和文化—认知性要素。本文运用这一分析框架讨论了档案制度中作为存在基石与外部母制度授权载体的规制性要素、作为适应性执行工具与非独立性角色的规范性要素和作为档案观念塑造框架与元认知背景的文化—认知性要素,阐述各要素的性质、特点与作用等。并进一步讨论了档案制度三要素的相互关系,指出规制性要素决定着档案信息权利的分配,因而占据核心主导地位,规范性要素为其提供理性和高效的技术与管理实现路径,文化—认知要素则为其提供内生性的认同支撑。对档案制度的构成要素及其关系进行根本剖析,目的是深化对档案制度本质的认识,明确其变迁的发展阶段及侧重点,从而在今后的档案制度创新过程中有的放矢地进行设计与规划。 Institutional elements analysis theory divide institution into regulatory elements, normative elements and culture - cognitive elements. This paper uses the analytical framework to discuss the nature, characteristics and functions of each element of archives institution. It analyzes the regulatory elements as a cornerstone and external parent system authorized carrier, the normative elements as an adaptive implemen- tation tools and non-independent roles, the cultural - cognitive elements as a framework of metaphysical and metaphorical background in archives institution. And further discusses the relationship between the three elements of the archives institution, pointing out that the regulatory elements determine the distribu- tion right of archival information, and thus occupy the core status, normative elements provide rational and efficient technology and management means to achieve the path, cultural - cognitive elements provide en- dogenous identity support. The purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of the nature of the archives institution, to clarify the development stage and focus of the change, so as to make the design and planning targeted in the process of the innovation of the archives institution in the future.
作者 陆阳
出处 《档案学通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期9-14,共6页 Archives Science Bulletin
基金 国家社科基金项目"社会治理视角下的档案制度变迁研究"(项目批准编号:14BTQ069)成果之一
关键词 档案制度 规制性要素 规范性要素 文化-认知性要素 Archives system Institutional composition Regulatory elements Normative elements Cultural- cognitive elements
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1吴宝康.档案起源与产生问题的再思考[J].档案学通讯,1988(5):4-8. 被引量:13
  • 2刘越男,张宁.电子文件风险评估——基于中外专家调查结果的比较研究[J].中国档案,2006(11):25-28. 被引量:7
  • 3马尔科姆·卢瑟福.经济学中的制度[M].陈建渡,郁仲莉,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:119.
  • 4NARA Basic Laws and Authorities, http://www.archives.gov/ about/laws/; Record Management Policy & Guidance, http://www.archives.gov/records -mgrnt/policy/; Toolkit for managing electronic records, http: //toolkit.archives.gov/.
  • 5Legislation and regulations, Key policies & initiatives, Guidance & standards, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information--management/.
  • 6http://www.naa.gov.au/records -management/publications/topic.aspx.
  • 7Framework for the management of information in the Government of Canada, Overview to, and links to legislation, regulations and policies, http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/im-gi/imppgi/other-autre-eng.asp.
  • 8Digital Policies, Guidelines and Tools, http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/digital-initiatives/O 12018-2000- e.html (2010-4-23).
  • 9Peterson, Z, N, J, 'Towards regulatory com- pliant storage systems ', PhD dissertation, THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, 2006.
  • 10McDonald, J, 'The frontier ten years on', in Mcleod,J and Hare,C (ed.), Managing electronic records, facet publishing, 2005, pp.1-15.

共引文献170

同被引文献134

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部