期刊文献+

以问题为基础的病案式教学在重症医学规范化培训中的应用 被引量:17

Application of clinical cases related problem-based-learning in critical care medical education
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨以问题为基础的病案式教学在重症医学规范化培训中的应用效果。方法2013年8月至2015年7月,对重症医学科进行规范化培训住院医师84人,采用抓阄法随机分为实验组(42名)和对照组(42名)。实验组采用以问题为基础的病案式教学,按照“选择病例——临床资料收集——提出问题——归纳分析、制定诊疗方案——学习反馈、调整”的流程教学;对照组采用传统教学。培训结束后采用多元化临床能力考核和自我反馈式调查问卷对两种培训方法进行效果评估。采用SPSS17.0对两组住院医师数据行t检验。结果实验组和对照组人员在年龄、性别、教育背景和专业背景方面较为均衡。实验组学员在体现住院医师综合能力的题库考核[(80.26±8.89)VS.(86.10±9.32)]、病例答辩[(84.83±5.43)vs.(75.36±6.06)]、临床步骤直接观察[(88.81±6.68)VS.(82.70±6.98)]、仿真模拟平台考核[(79.86±10.09)vs.(72.71±9.30)]成绩方面,均优于对照组。问卷调查结果显示,实验组学员对自身培训方法在激发自主学习、培养独立思考习惯、提高临床问题分析能力、促进临床思维建立、提高临床沟通能力和团队协作等方面的满意度,均优于对照组对自身所受培训方法的评价。结论在重症医学科实施以问题为基础的病案式教学是可行的,有利于提高住院医师规范化培训效果。 Objective To evaluate the application of clinical cases related problem-based-learning (PBL) method in critical care medical standardized resident training program. Methods 84 residents were randomly divided into experimental group (n=42) and control group (n=42) by lottery way. The experimental group received PBL process during clinical case analysis while the control group learned completely through traditional teaching method. The residents' clinical competence were assessed by multiple scale mixed method including question bank examination (QBE), case-based discussion (CBD), direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS), simulation etc, and Likert-type scale questionnaire was used to evaluate the feedback of training residents. SPSS 17.0 was used to do line t test to the data of both groups. Results Finally 84 residents finished the study. There were no difference in the general conditions in two groups. The PBL group achieved higher examination score during QBE [(80.26 ± 8.89) vs. (86.10± 9.32)], CBD [(84.83 ± 5.43) vs. (75.36 ± 6.06)], DOPS [(88.81± 6.68) vs. (82.70 ± 6.98)], simulation [(79.86 ±10.09) vs. (72.71 ± 9.30)]. Except two groups residents all gave high scores in enhancing cross connection in clinical knowledge [(4.786 ±0.470) vs. (4.571± 0.859), P=0.16], and the questionnaire results showed that the resi- dents of PBL group gave higher points in exciting autonomous learning, improving clin-ical analysis ability, accelerating clinical thinking establish, developing independent thinking habits, improving the clinical communication skills and teamwork ability (P〈0.05). Conclusion The clinical cases related PBL method can improve the training effects during critical care medical standardized resident training program. It can be used broadly after adapting modification in critical care medical education.
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2017年第6期614-618,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
关键词 以问题为基础的学习 重症医学 住院医师规范化培训 临床能力评估 学员反馈 Problem-based learning Intensive care medicine Standardized resident training program Clinical competence assessment Students' feedback
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1俞锐敏,蒋亚斌,张宁.高端模拟系统在急诊医学教学中的作用[J].中国高等医学教育,2006(1):23-23. 被引量:19
  • 2Hershey S.Bell,李井泉.医学生教育中形成性评价的运用[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(4):285-285. 被引量:96
  • 3Institute of Medicine. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality [ M ]. Washington : The National Academies Press, 2003.
  • 4美国毕业后医学教育委员会与美国专科医师委员会联合动议文件.评估方法工具箱,2000.
  • 5Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance [J]. Aead bled, 1990, 65(9):63-67.
  • 6Lee AG, Carter KD. Managing the new mandate in resident education: a blueprint for translating a national mandate into local compliance [J]. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111 (9) : 1807-1812.
  • 7Pokorny K,Yamazaki K,Swing S.ACGME Outcomes Project[EB/OL].(2005-03-30)[2010-08-01].http://www.acgme.org/outcome.
  • 8Norcini JJ,Blank LL,Duffy FD,et a1.The Mini-CEX:a method for assessing clinical skills.Ann Intern Med,2003,138(6):476-481.
  • 9Lasya G,Susan S.Evaluation competence in medical students.AMA,2004,291(17):2143-2151.
  • 10Zubin A,Carol OB,John P,et a1.Instructional design and assessment development and validation processes for an objective clinical examination(OSCE) for entry-to-practice certification in pharmacy:The Canadian experience.Am J Pharm Educ,2003,67(3):76-83.

共引文献79

同被引文献160

引证文献17

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部