期刊文献+

BL分析下的管制员差错本体建模研究

Research on ATC Errors for Ontology Modeling under BL Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为分析识别空中交通管制任务中管制差错问题,结合BL(body loop,BL)压力产生模型研究管制员压力来源。提出领域本体的建模流程,确立推理模型的内部逻辑关系,构建管制差错领域本体模型。采用FaCT++推理机针对实际案例进行语义推理,从而识别管制差错类型,提出了基于本体的管制差错专家系统的系统框架。结果验证了构建推理模型的有效性和合理性。 To analysis and identify ATC errors in air traffic control task,the stress source of air traffic con-trollers is studied via BL model. Meanwhile, this paper proposes modeling process of domain ontology and establishes the internal logical relationship of reasoning model and constructs domain ontology model of ATC errors. Using FaCT ++ inference machine to semanticlly reason actual cases,the type of ATC errors is identificated. Also,system framework of ontology - based expert system for ATC errors is presented. Re-sults show that constructing reasoning model is valid and reasonable.
出处 《航空计算技术》 2017年第4期30-33,共4页 Aeronautical Computing Technique
基金 国家重点研发计划项目资助(2016YFB0502401) 国家空管科研课题项目资助(GKG201410003) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(3122014D040 3122017062)
关键词 空中交通管制 管制差错 BL 领域本体 语义推理 air traffic control ATC errors BL domain ontology semanticlly reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1胡明华.我国空管安全管理体系实然性研究[J].南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(1):43-46. 被引量:7
  • 2Shorrock S T, Kirwan R. Development and applica- tion of a human error identification tool for air traffic control[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2002,33 (4) : 319- 336.
  • 3ICAO. ICAO 7970-2002[S]. ICAO ANNEX 19. Canada: ICAO, 2002.
  • 4ICAO. Doc 9859[S]. Canada: ICAO, 2009.
  • 5International Electrotechnical Commission. CEI/IEC 300-3-9[S]. Geneva : ICE , 1995.
  • 6EricsonCA.危险分析技术[M].赵廷弟,焦健,赵远,等译.北京:国防工业出版社,2012.
  • 7Bosse T, Hoogendoorn M, Klein M C A,et al. Mod- elling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions[J]. Autonomous A- gent Multi-Agent Systems,2013, 27(1):52-84.
  • 8Bosse T, Mogles N M. Formal analysis of aviation incidents[C]//25th International Conference on In- dustrial Engineering and Other Applications of Ap- plied Intelligent Systems. Dalian, China: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012 : 371-380.
  • 9Geisinger K. Guide to Methods & Tools for Safety Analysis in Air Traffic Management [EB/OL]. ht- tp ://flightsafety. org/files/methods_ tools_ safety_ a- nalysis, pdf, 2003.
  • 10Stroeve S H, Blom H A P, van der Park M N J. Multi-agent situation awareness error evolution in ac- cident risk modeling[C]//5'h USA/Europe Air Traf- fic Management R&D Seminar. Budapest, Hungary: [s. n. 1, 2003.

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部