期刊文献+

“星二代”负面信息对“星一代”代言的负面溢出效应——基于消费者思维方式的视角 被引量:4

Negative Spillover Effects of Celebrity Offspring's Negative Message on Celebrity Endorsements:From the Perspective of Consumers' Thinking Mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究基于消费者思维方式的视角,检验了"星二代"负面信息对"星一代"代言的负面溢出效应,名人形象感知以及"星一代"事后反应对负面溢出效应的调节作用。采用2(思维方式:整体性与分析性)×2("星一代"名人形象感知:正面与负面)×2("星一代"事后反应:承认与否认)被试间实验的方法,发现与分析性思维方式的消费者相比,整体性思维方式的消费者感知到"星二代"与"星一代"代言人间更高的相似性;面对"星二代"的负面信息时,整体性思维方式的消费者的负面溢出效应大于分析性思维方式的消费者,并受到名人形象感知以及"星一代"事后反应的调节作用。 The present research based on consumers' thinking mode,explores negative spillover effects of celebrity offspring's negative message on celebrity Endorsements and the moderating effect of celebrities' image and their reaction to the negative message. The research adopts a 2( thinking mode: holistic vs. analytic) ×2( celebrity image: positive vs. negative) ×2( celebrity's reaction: admit vs. deny) between-subject experimental method. We find that compared with analytic thinking consumers,holistic thinking consumers perceive celebrity offspring in a more similar way they perceive celebrity endorsements. In the event of celebrity offspring's negative message,the negative spillover effect of holistic thinking consumers is greater than that of analytic thinking consumers,but celebrities' image and their reaction to the negative message play a moderating role.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第8期121-135,共15页 Management Review
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL092)
关键词 整体性思维方式 分析性思维方式 名人负面信息 负面溢出效应 holistic thinking style analytic thinking style celebrity negative information negative spillover effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献184

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3137
  • 2Scott A, Reid M A H. A Self - Categorization Explanation for the Third -Person Effect[J] . Human Communication Research,2005, 31(1): 129-161.
  • 3Paek H - J, Z Pan, et al. The Third - Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads [ J ]. Communication Re- search, 2005, 32(2) : 143 - 170.
  • 4Gunther AC. What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third -person Effect [ J]. Communication Research, 1991,18(3) :355 -372.
  • 5Atwood L E. Illusions of Media Power: The Third - person Effect [J]. Journalism Quarterly,1994,71 (2) :269 -281.
  • 6Meirick P C. Topic - Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance: Political Advertising and First - and Third - Person Effects [ J ]. Communication Research,2004, 31 (2) : 234 - 255.
  • 7Gunther A C, Mundy P. Biased Optimism and the Third - person Effect[J]. Journalism Quarterly,1993, 70(1 ) :57 -67.
  • 8Hovland Carl I, Weiss W. The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness [ J ]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1952,15(4):635 -650.
  • 9McGuire. Attitudes and Attitude Change [ A]. Handbook of Social Psychology[Z]. Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, New York: Random House, 1985. 233 - 346.
  • 10Ohanian, Roobina. The Impact of Celebrity Spokesperson'Perceived Image on Consumers'Intention to Purchase[ J]. Journal of Advertising Research, 1991, 31 ( 1 ) :46 - 54.

共引文献146

同被引文献63

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部