期刊文献+

腹腔恒温热灌注联合静脉化疗治疗Ⅱ~Ⅲ期直肠癌术后患者的临床疗效 被引量:6

Clinical Observation of Homothermal Peritoneal Hot-perfusion Chemotherapy and Intravenous Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅱ~Ⅲ Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腹腔恒温热灌注联合静脉化疗治疗腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后患者的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析58例直肠癌患者的临床资料,根据化疗方式分为单纯全身静脉化疗组(对照组)28例及腹腔恒温热灌注+全身静脉化疗组(实验组)30例。比较两组患者术后恢复情况、临床总有效率、化疗不良反应等方面的差异。结果两组患者术后恢复情况、化疗不良反应及并发症发生率等方面比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05),而实验组治疗后临床总有效率(83.3%)明显高于对照组(71.4%),且局部复发率(3.3%)及远处转移率(6.7%)显著低于对照组(21.4%,28.6%),而1年生存率(96.7%)明显高于对照组(78.6%),差异均具有统计学意义(P<O.05)。结论腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术后辅以腹腔恒温热灌注联合静脉化疗,可以提高患者的1年生存率,降低局部复发及转移率,同时不加重患者化疗毒副反应,且不影响患者术后恢复情况,是一种安全有效的治疗手段,值得临床大力推广。 Objective To explore the therapeutic efficacy of homothermal peritoneal hot-perfusion chemotherapy with intravenous chemotherapy for stage Ⅱ ~ Ⅲ rectal cancer. Methods Clinical data of 58 cases of rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. 58 cases of advanced rectal cancer were divided into HIPEC group( n = 30) and the control group( n = 28). After radical resection,HIPEC combined with the FOLFOX6 chemotherapy plan was the experiment grou. The control group received FOLFOX6 chemotherapy plan only. Indicators related to postoperative recovery、clinical efficacy rate and the adverse reactions of chemotherapy of the 2 groups were compared. Results The differences of postoperative recovery,adverse reactions of chemotherapy and the incidence of complications of the 2 groups had no statistical significance( P〈0. 05). In the experiment group,the clinical efficacy rate( 83. 3%) was higher than the control group( 71. 4%),and the local recurrence and distant metastasis rate of the experiment group was lower than the control group( 3. 3% vs 21. 4%,6. 7% vs 28. 6%,P〈0. 05),1-year survival rate of the experiment group( 96. 7%) was higher than the control group( 78. 6%)( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Combination of homothermal peritoneal hot-perfusion chemotherapy with intravenous chemotherapy does not increase complications and adverse reaction of chemotherapy,however,it can decrease the rate of postoperative intraperitoneal recurrence and metastasis,improve the prognosis of patients,thus it is worthy of promoting.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2017年第9期1508-1510,1514,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 腹腔恒温热灌注化疗 静脉化疗 直肠癌 Homothermal peritoneal hot-perfusion chemotherapy Intravenous chemotherapy Rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献126

  • 1郭仁宏.晚期胃癌的一线药物治疗进展[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(1):47-52. 被引量:10
  • 2张纯,莫汉文,周建平,李文媚,张静玉.奥沙利铂持续腹腔热灌注治疗癌性腹水的临床研究[J].医师进修杂志,2005,28(6):15-16. 被引量:13
  • 3蔡善荣,郑树,张苏展.不同年龄组大肠癌预后多因素分析的比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(8):483-485. 被引量:41
  • 4陈雪琴,马胜林.肿瘤热疗作用机制研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005,27(9):562-564. 被引量:23
  • 5Ohtani H,Tamamori Y,Azuma T,et al.A meta-analysis of the short-and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that comparedlaparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectalcance[r J].J Gastrointest Surg,2011,15(8):1375-85.
  • 6Anderson C,Uman G,Pigazzi A.Oncologic outcomes of laparo-scopic surgery for rectal cancer:a systematic review andmeta-analysis of the literature[J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2008,34(10):1135-42.
  • 7da Luz Moreira A,Mor I,Geisler DP,et al.Laparoscopic resectionfor rectal cancer:a case-matched study[J].Surg Endosc,2011,25(1):278-83.
  • 8Baik SH,Gincherman M,Mutch MG,et al.Laparoscopic vs openresection for patients with rectal cancer:comparison ofperioperative outcomes and long-term survival[J].Dis ColonRectum,2011,54(1):6-14.
  • 9Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al.Short-term endpoints ofconventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients withcolorectal cancer(MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomisedcontrolled tria[l J].Lancet,2005,365(9472):1718-26.
  • 10Law WL,Lee YM,Choi HK,et al.Laparoscopic and open anteriorresection for upper and mid rectal cancer:an evaluation of outcomes[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2006,49(8):1108-15.

共引文献236

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部