摘要
职务犯罪领域共同犯罪的定性一直是刑事司法的重点、疑难问题。在对身份混合的共同职务犯罪案件定性时,国家工作人员这一身份应优先于其他身份对行为性质产生影响,宜按照国家工作人员所触犯的罪名对各共同犯罪人定罪处罚。应当承认职务犯罪中的片面帮助犯,并以帮助者是否认识到正犯犯罪的意思与行为,是否得力于自己的暗中帮助行为为标准判断是否成立片面帮助犯。职务犯罪领域存在过失的共同正犯,但不存在过失的教唆犯或过失的帮助犯。
The identification of joint crime in the field of duty crime has always been the focus and difficult problem of criminal justice. In the case of the common - duty crime cases, the identity of state functionaries should be given priority over other acts, and the common offenders should be convicted and punished according to the of- fenses committed by the state functionaries. We should recognize the one - sided accomplice in duty crime, and the two standards should be taken in determining whether one - sided accomplice is established: whether the helper recognizes the meaning and behavior of principal offender, and whether the joint crime is due to the helping behav- ior in secret. There is negligent common principal offender in the field of duty crime, but there is no negligent insti- gator and accomplice.
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2017年第4期109-114,共6页
Journal of Henan Police College
基金
四川省教育厅基层司法能力研究中心课题"职务犯罪中共同犯罪行为若干问题研究"(JCSF2017-06)的阶段性成果
关键词
职务犯罪
身份
片面共犯
共同过失犯
duty crime
identity
one - sided accomplice
crime of joint negligence