摘要
为探讨电动按摩治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ期肛裂及肛门病手术后疼痛的效果，将Ⅰ、Ⅱ期肛裂及肛门病手术后疼痛患者328例分为3组，A组155例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期肛裂疼痛患者均采用肛裂治疗器治疗，B组50例肛门病手术后疼痛患者均采用肛门镇痛器治疗，C组123例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期肛裂疼痛患者采用外用药物治疗，比较3组镇痛效果。结果显示，A、B2组镇痛有效率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），A、B组镇痛有效率明显高于C组（P〈0．05）。结果表明，电动按摩治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ期肛裂及肛门病手术后疼痛效果确切。
This study was to explore the efficacy in managing postoperative pain of Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage anal fissure and anal disease patients, divided 328 patients with postoperative pain into three groups： group A （155 cases of anal fissure） adopted treatment device of anal fissure, group B （50 cases of anal diseases） received anal analgesia device, group C （123 cases of Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage of anal fissure） was subject to drugs externally; then the efficacy of managing pain in the 3 groups was compared. As results, the effective analgesia rate had no statistical difference between group A and B （ P 〉0.05）;but compared with group C,both A and B was significantly higher （ P 〈0.05）. Results show that for Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage of anal fissure and anal diseases powered massage has certain effect. Key Words Anal fissure; Postoperation of anal disease;Pain;Powered massage
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2017年第7期45-46,共2页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
肛裂
肛门病手术后
疼痛
电动按摩
This study was to explore the efficacy in managing postoperative pain of Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage anal fissure and anal disease patients, divided 328 patients with postoperative pain into three groups： group A （155 cases of anal fissure） adopted treatment device of anal fissure, group B （50 cases of anal diseases） received anal analgesia device, group C （123 cases of Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage of anal fissure） was subject to drugs externally
then the efficacy of managing pain in the 3 groups was compared. As results, the effective analgesia rate had no statistical difference between group A and B （ P 〉0.05）
but compared with group C,both A and B was significantly higher （ P 〈0.05）. Results show that for Ⅰ、Ⅱ stage of anal fissure and anal diseases powered massage has certain effect. Key Words Anal fissure
Postoperation of anal disease
Pain
Powered massage
