期刊文献+

EGFR突变型转移性非小细胞肺癌的靶向治疗疗效及安全性 被引量:9

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型转移性非小细胞肺癌的靶向治疗疗效及安全性。方法选取80例EGFR突变型转移性非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各40例。对照组采用放射治疗,观察组采用表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)吉非替尼联合放疗治疗,随访5~25个月,比较两组患者治疗4周后的疗效、治疗过程中的不良反应及随访结束时的生存情况。结果治疗4周后,观察组患者的治疗有效率和疾病控制率高于对照组(57.5%vs 35.0%,82.5%vs62.5%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的不良反应均以1~2级为主,观察组患者的不良反应发生率为90.0%(36/40),与对照组的85.0%(34/40)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组与对照组患者的中位生存时间分别为15.2个月(95%CI:12.357~18.697)和12.1个月(95%CI:9.354~15.652),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=5.026,P=0.025)。结论对于EGFR突变型转移性非小细胞肺癌,EGFR-TKI靶向治疗可以提高疗效,延长患者的生存时间。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Method 80 patients of metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutation were enrolled in the study, and were administered with radiotherapy (control group, n=40) or EGFR-TKI (gefitinib) combined with radiotherapy (study group, n=40), after a follow up period of 5-25 months, the curative effect, adverse reactions dur-ing the treatment and the survival of patients at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups after 4 weeks of treatment. Result After 4 weeks of treatment, the response rate of the study group (57.5%vs 35.0%) and dis-ease control rate (82.5%vs 62.5%) were significantly higher than that of the control group, with statistically significant difference observed (P〈0.05). The adverse reactions of the two groups were mainly grade I-II, and the incidence of ad-verse reactions in study group was 90.0%(36/40), compared with 85.0%(34/40) in control group, the difference was of no significant difference (P〉0.05). The median survival time of the study group and the control group were 15.2 months (95%CI:12.357-18.697) and 12.1 months (95%CI:9.354-15.652) respectively, and were significantly different between the two groups (χ2=5.026, P=0.025). Conclusion In the treatment of NSCLC with EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKI targeted therapy may improve the efficacy and prolong survival time for patients.
出处 《癌症进展》 2017年第7期771-773,779,共4页 Oncology Progress
关键词 放射治疗 非小细胞肺癌 吉非替尼 EGFR突变 radiotherapy non-small cell lung cancer gefitinib EGFR mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1汪安兰,周辉,文晓萍,易青,周文伟,王伟,姚定泉,徐建华,黄芝华.527例不能手术的Ⅲ/Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌化放综合治疗的疗效分析[J].中国肺癌杂志,2007,10(3):219-222. 被引量:6
  • 2陈智伟,廖美琳,陈玉蓉,赵家美,张心敏,成柏君.WHO标准和RECIST标准评价肺癌化疗疗效的比较[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):83-84. 被引量:33
  • 3李猛,于晓玲,梁萍.肺癌热消融治疗研究进展[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(9):1420-1423. 被引量:5
  • 4田立景,田秀荣.^125I粒子内放疗联合化疗治疗中晚期肺癌52例疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2008,35(2):82-84. 被引量:6
  • 5TORRE LA, BRAY F, SIEGEL RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015,65 (2) : 87-108. DOI : 10.3322/ caac.21262.
  • 6WISTIBA II, GELOVANI JG, JACOBY JJ, et al. Methodological and practical challenges for personalized cancer therapies [J]. Na- ture Rev Clin Oncol, 2011,8 (3) : 135-141. DOI: 10.1038/nrcli- nonc.2011.2.
  • 7FUKUOKA M, WU YL, THONPRASERT S, et al. Biomarker analy- ses and final overall survival results from a phase Ⅲ , randomized, open-label, first-fine study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small- cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS) [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2011,29 (21): 2866- 2874. DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.4235.
  • 8INOUE A, KOBAYASHI K, MAEMONDO M, et al. Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase Ⅲ trial comparing gefitinib with carboplatin-paclitaxel for chemo-naive non-small cell lung can- cer with sensitive EGFR gene mutations (NEJO02) [J]. Ann Oncol, 2013,24 ( 1 ) : 54-59. DOI : 10.1093/annonc/mds214.
  • 9ZHOU C, WU YL, CHEN G, et al. Final overall survival results from a randomised,phase Ⅲ study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first- line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802) [J]. Ann Oncol, 2015,26 (9) : 1877-1883. DOI : 10.1093/annonc/mdv276.
  • 10NURWIDYA F, TAKAHASHI F, MURAKAMI A, ct al. Acquired re- sistance of non-small cell lung cancer to epidermal growth factor re- ceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors [ J ]. Respir Investig, 2014,52 (2) : 82-91. DOI : 10.1016/j.resinv.2013.07.007.

共引文献1553

同被引文献74

引证文献9

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部