4Ruth H. Maki, Micheal Shields, Amanda Easton Wheeler, Tammy Lowery Zacchilli. Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 97 (4) :723-731.
5Jone O, Joanne H, Deborah S. Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehension. Reading and Writing, 2005, 18: 657- 686.
6Svjetlana K, Lgor B. Metacognitive strategies and reading compehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychoiogy of Education, 2006, 4:439-451.
7Keith W. Thiede, Mary C. M. Anderson summarizing can improve metacomprehension Accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2003, 28(2): 129-160.
8Thiede K W, Dunlosky J, standing the delay-keyword Griffin T D, et al. Undereffect on metacomprehension. Accuracy Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2005, 3(6): 1267- 1280.
9Thomas D G, Jennifer W, Keith W T. Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 (1): 93-103.
10Louise M. Comprehension monitoring in First and Second language reading. The Canadian Modem Language Review, 2004, 61(1): 77-106.
