期刊文献+

自发到自觉:我国市场信息不对称法律规制体系研究 被引量:5

From Spontaneity to Self-Consciousness: A Study on the Legal Regulation System of Market Information Asymmetry in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息不对称会导致市场失灵,引起逆向选择和道德风险,这种问题市场是有效市场的隐患,市场自身不能解决,需要公共机构的强制介入,而一般的公共机构缺乏权威,因此需要政府的法律规制。依据科斯定理和法经济学的理论,当交易费用大于零时产权的分配及调整相比交易本身调整能够带来更大社会福利。因此,市场信息不对称法律规制的关键所在是信息披露义务的分配及违反该义务的救济。当前我国市场信息不对称法律规制存在众多问题,尚未形成体系。如:缺少信息不对称法律规制原则、规则体系;法律规制的方法体系中缺少第三方工具、激励工具,工具的设置也缺少经济学和法学理论依据;对于市场信息不对称法律规制核心内容总结不足等。完善其基本思路:遵循信息持有人负披露商品信息义务的原则、制定违反信息披露义务单独惩戒规则及举证责任倒置规则,形成信息不对称法律规制的原则和规则体系;依据一般法理,概括市场信息不对称法律规制体系的核心内容,包含:市场信息披露权利和义务的确定,不披露信息行为的定性及分类;信息不对称行为的法律责任;完善第三方和社会公益组织信息披露工具,依成本—效益理论设置惩罚工具,常态化激励工具,合理设置组合工具,形成信息不对称法律规制的方法体系。 The information asymmetry will lead to market failure including adverse selection and moral hazard. Therefore, the legal regulation is necessary. According to the Coase Theorem and law and economics theory, the focal point of the legal regulation of market information asymmetry is the disclosure of information in an assigned duty and the relief for breach of the obligations. At present, there are many problems of legal regulation of market information asymmetry in China and the system has not been formed yet. This paper puts forward the following suggestions: the principle of the information holder bearing the disclosure obligation of information should be set up, separate disciplinary rules for violation of information disclosure obligation and the inversion of onus probandi should be established, thus, the system of principles and rules the legal regulation of the information asymmetry can be formed. The information disclosure tool of the third party and social welfare organizations should be perfected, the instrument of punishment should be set up according to the cost-benefit theory, the incentive tools should be normalized, the reasonable combination of tools should be set up, thus, the method system of the legal regulation of the information asymmetry can be formed.
作者 李军 陈新岗
出处 《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2017年第4期16-31,共16页 Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 山东省人文社会科学项目(15-JS-YB-11)
关键词 市场信息不对称 科斯定理 成本—收益理论 信息披露义务 举证责任倒置 法律规制体系 法律规制方法 market information asymmetry Coase Theorem cost-benefit theory obligation of information disclosure inversion of onus probandi system of the legal regulation methods of the legal regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1黄全.论政府信息公开的原则体系[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(1):79-85. 被引量:5
  • 2《明史·选举志》.《明史》卷71,长沙:岳麓书社,1996年,第1001页.
  • 3保罗·斯洛维奇等.《事实对恐惧:理解可觉知的风险》,丹尼尔·卡尼曼等编.《不确定状况下的判断:启发式和偏差》,方文等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008年,第535页.
  • 4王心见.《1918年大流感高致死率谜底揭开》,《科技日报》2006年9月29日,第2版.
  • 5Coase, 1960: The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, October, 1960, pages 1 - 44.Reprinted as Chapter Five in The Firm, The Market, and The Law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988,pages95 - 156.
  • 6Coase,1988a: Notes on the Problem of Social Cost, Chapter Six in The Firm, The Market, and The Law, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1988, pages157 - 185.
  • 7Coase,1988b: The Firm, The Market, and The Law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • 8Coase, 1988c: The Nature of the Firm, Economica, new series 4 (November 1937), pages386 -405.Reprinted as Chapter Two in The Firm, The Market, and The Law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988,pages33 - 55.
  • 9Coase,1988d: The Firm, The Market, and The Law , Chapter One in The Firm, The Market, and The Law, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1988, pages 1-31.
  • 10Rowley, 1980: Rowley, Charles K., "The 'Problem' of Social Cost", Prologue to The Myth of Social Cost, by Steven N. S. Cheung (CATO Institute, 1980), pagesxvii - xxii.

共引文献438

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部