期刊文献+

乡村中学的翻转课堂研究——以山东省某镇中学为例 被引量:17

Research on Flipped Classroom in Rural Middle School: a case study of a Rural Middle School in Shandong
原文传递
导出
摘要 在线开放教育为优质教育资源共享带来了契机。翻转课堂依赖优质教育资源开放共享的优势,对提升教育资源薄弱学校的教育质量、促进基础教育均衡发展意义重大,因此对教育资源薄弱学校的翻转效果进行研究有现实意义。本文通过运用两期、多期双重差分法以及简单线性回归模型对山东一所乡村中学的翻转教学实践进行研究,通过课堂观察、访谈、问卷调查、管理数据等的采集,考察了翻转课堂教学改革对该校学生认知能力和非认知能力的影响。研究发现,在认知能力方面,翻转课堂在短期内有助于学生数学成绩的提升,而从长期看来,翻转课堂不仅不能显著提高学生的学业成绩,反而对学生的英语成绩有显著的消极影响;在非认知能力方面,翻转课堂使得师生关系更为融洽,但是学生的学习能力自我效能感有所降低。 In the era of information technology, flipped classroom, with its advantage of opening and sharing of high-quality educational resources, has great potentials to improve education quality in weak schools and thus improve education equity. Thus, it is necessary to explore the effects of flipped classroom in weak schools. In this article, using difference-in-difference model and OLS model, we study the case of a weak rural middle school in Shandong, and estimate the influence of flipped classroom on the students" cognitive abilities and non-cognitive abilities by classroom observation, interviews, and quantitative analysis. We find that, in terms of cognitive abilities, flipped classroom can significantly improve students" mathematical scores in a short time, however, flipped classroom has no impact on students" mathematical and Chinese scores, and it has a significant and negative impact on students" English scores in the long run. In terms of non-cognitive abilities, flipped classroom makes the relationship between teachers and students more harmonious.
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第15期15-24,共10页 Research in Educational Development
基金 清华大学教育研究院在线教育课题组的研究成果之一 广东全通教育股份有限公司资助
关键词 乡村中学 翻转课堂 学业评价 基础教育均衡发展 rural middle school, flipped classroom, academic performance appraisal, balanced development of elementary
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献58

  • 1J. s. Colman,E. Campbell,C. Hobson,J. McPartland, A. Mood,R. Weinfeld & R, York, Equity of Educational Opportunity(Washington,DC:Government Printing Office,1966).
  • 2http://wbro. oxford journals, org/content/20/1/29, short.
  • 3J. Angrist andJ- S. Pischke,Mostly Harmless Economics: An Empiricist's Companion, lSted. (Princeton,NJ:Prince- ton University Press, 2009).
  • 4Richard Blundell & Monica C. Dias, "Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics,"Journal of Human Resources 44,3 (2009):565 -640.
  • 5Guido W. Imbens and Jeffrey M. Wool- dridge,"Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature 47, 1 (2009) : 5 - 86.
  • 6Richard J. Mumane &John B. Willett,Methods Matter : Improving Causal Inference in Educational and Social Science Research, 1x ed(Oxford University Press,2010).
  • 7Richard J. Murnane & John B. Willett, Methods Matter : Improving Causal Inference in Educational and Social Science Research, 1st ed(Oxford University Press, 2010), 82 - 106.
  • 8Alan Krueger,"Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions,"Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 2 (1999) :497 - 532.
  • 9Stem,David,Dayton, Charles, Paik, IL- Woo, Weisberg, Alan, "Benefits and Costs of Dropout Prevention in a High School Program Combining Academic and Vocational Education: Third - Year Results from Replications of the Cali- fornia Peninsula Academies, "Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11,4 (1989) : 405 - 416.
  • 10David S. Lee,"Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects,'Rev/e-w of Economic Studies76,3(2009) 1071 - 1102.

同被引文献191

引证文献17

二级引证文献1351

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部