中德著作权损害赔偿之比较法研究

A Comparative Study of Copyright Damage Compensation between China and Germany

德国著作权侵权损害赔偿制度对我国有借鉴作用,通过比较中德两国的制度可知两国在著作权损害赔偿原则、类推许可与合理交易费用、法院酌定赔偿的必要性与规范方式和法院酌定赔偿的确定因素等方面存在差异。德国《著作权与邻接权法》将主观过错作为赔偿责任前提条件的立法值得我国参考借鉴,同时对确定侵权赔偿数额的顺序、法院酌定赔偿数额、惩罚性赔偿的范围等适用于我国的修法建议进行了可行性论证,并参酌德国法在理论及司法实践中的相关经验,系统阐述我国著作权侵权损害赔偿的实然面与应然面,以期对我国司法实务及立法提供一个有价值的参考依据。

German copyright infringement damage compensation system can be used for reference in China. There are differences in licensing and reasonable compensation principle,the transaction costs,the court discretion in copyright damage compensation system through the comparison between China and Germany,the necessity and standard way and the discretion of the court for the determining factors. The legislation of copyright and neighboring rights law of Germany regards subjective fault as the precondition of compensation,which is worth our consideration. At the same time,to determine the amount of compensation for infringement of the order,the court discretion compensation,punitive compensation scope for amending the law suggestions for feasibility analysis. And refer to the relevant experience of German law in theory and judicial practice, the system expounded China＇s copyright infringement damages be and ought to be,in order to provide a valuable reference for China＇s legislation and practice.