《资本论》为什么需要保卫

Why does Das Kapital Need to be Defended?

沿着"学术保卫"工作路径,《资本论》应视为"科学作品意义的史书"。然则,政治经济学批判必须作为特别的学科方法(规定)予以处理,从中引出人类经济形态的认识论议题,即主体批判和客体批判。从客体的历史世界的发展角度,马克思《资本论》演绎了方法论上的"唯物主义"与"辩证法",并抓住了政治经济学批判的工作逻辑(形式)。同样从发展的角度看问题,整全意义的批判概念在定义域上落入研究对象的"和而不同"之中了,这要求我们重视对"身份"、"财产"并重的经济形态特性的研究。换言之,身份二重性与劳动二重性的规定性的"携手并进",产品和商品的经济形式的"相互拱卫",此是政治和经济的最为深远意义的相互"历史组装"的形态。在这一工作语境中,劳动批判意味着"双重性超越":既历史超越"身份绑缚",又社会超越"财产束缚",实现彻底自由取向的发展。中华主体批判的路径为不可或缺的工作侧面,又或是社会主义运动之"涌泉之流",整体看,这是"自为阶级"(行动主义主体)的历史形成基础。

Das Kapital should be regarded as the＂scientific history book＂. That＇s because the critique of political economy including subject criticism and object criticism has been dealt with as a special discipline method. From the perspective of the development of the historical world of the object, Marx＇s Das Kapital deduces the methodology of materialism and dialectics and catches the working logical form of critique of political economy. In the meantime, Chinese economics focuses on the subject critical logic. This is the＂Harmony without sameness＂of object of study to help to think about the language of Chinese Economics. In this context of work,labor critique means＂dual transcendence＂, which contains＂beyond identity＂and＂beyond property＂. As a result, the＂academic defense＂of Das Kapital should be composed of three work elements which are＂critique of political economy＂,＂history＂, and＂theory ofaction＂respectively. The method of Chinese subject Critical is an indispensable working side or the spring of socialist movement, in the large picture this is the basis of the development of the history of class-for-itself（the subject of activism）.These make it possible for us to call the paper＂preface of the Defense of Das Kapital＂（revised in 2017）.