摘要
纵观近百年来中国政治思想史研究之历程,其主要呈现出三大研究范式:治道范式;平民主义或民本主义范式;王权主义范式。实际上,这些范式是近代自由主义、激进主义与保守主义三大思潮在中国政治思想史建构过程中的互动彰显。任何一种研究范式都无法跳脱其当下性,而中国政治思想史的重构必须在当下问题意识与传统语境主义还原之间寻找平衡点。中国政治思想史研究的现时情形将在很大程度上导致对上述所言之研究范式进行重新检讨其作为单一方式存在的合理性。只有在重整其研究范式之后,中国政治思想史的研究才能得以切实推进。
In the recent hundred years of history China political thought history, it mainly presents three research paradigms: the first is a paradigm of governance; the second is a populist or humanism paradigm; the third is the paradigm of kingship. In fact, these paradigms are an interactive display of the three ideas of modern liberalism, radicalism and conservatism in the history of Chinese political thought. None of the research paradigms can jump to the bottom. The reconstruction of the history of Chinese political thought must find the balance between the present problem consciousness and the traditional contextualism. China's political thought of the thought history research present situation, may lead to a great extent, the above said the research paradigm for a review of the rationality of its existence as a single way. Only after reforming its research paradigm can the research of China's political and intellectual history be pushed forward.
出处
《湖北经济学院学报》
2017年第4期92-96,103,共6页
Journal of Hubei University of Economics
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(16BKS123)
关键词
中国
政治思想史
研究范式
China
the history of political thought
research paradigm