摘要
Objective： The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers. Methods： A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined. Results： An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument （0.547）, new evidence （0.345）, and new conclusion （0.109）. Conclusions： The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high： therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.
Objective： The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers. Methods： A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined. Results： An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument （0.547）, new evidence （0.345）, and new conclusion （0.109）. Conclusions： The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high： therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.
