期刊文献+

证券市场价格涨跌幅限制制度的实验研究 被引量:1

An Experimental Study on the Prices Cap and Floor Limit System of Securities Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验经济学的研究方法在信息对称的实验室股票市场中检验有效市场假说,检验价格涨跌幅限制制度是否能减少股票价格波动和市场的过度投机行为,从而促进市场有效性的提高。实验结果表明,在信息对称的实验室股票市场中,股票交易价格在一定程度上偏离了股票的基本价值,出现了价格偏高或偏低现象,与有效市场假说相悖;并且,价格涨跌幅限制制度不能减少股票价格波动和市场的过度投机行为,反而在很大程度上阻碍了股票交易价格向基本价值靠近的速度,降低了市场有效性,同时也不能降低股票换手率,未能减少市场中投机性交易的数量。证券市场交易制度的政策制定者可以重新评估价格涨跌幅限制制度的作用,进一步深入研究证券市场价格涨跌幅限制制度的合理性。 Based on the method of experimental economics,a test is made on the effective market hypothesis in the information symmetric laboratory stock markets,considering whether the price cap and floor limit system can reduce stock price volatility and excessive speculation in the market,so as to improve the effectiveness of the markets. The experimental results show that in the symmetrical information laboratory stock market,the stock trading prices deviate from the basic value of the stock to a certain extent with higher or lower prices,and contrary to the effective market hypothesis; in the symmetrical information laboratory stock markets,the price cap and floor limit system cannot reduce the excessive speculation and stock price volatility in the market,on the contrary,to a large extent,hindered the speed of the stock trading prices close to the basic value,hence reducing the market efficiency,but also reducing the stock turnover rate,without the number of speculative trading in the market decreased. It's time for the policy makers of the stock market trading system to re-evaluate the role of the price cap and floor limit system and discuss its rationality.
作者 林嘉永
出处 《征信》 2017年第7期87-92,共6页 Credit Reference
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71401105) 上海市教委科研创新项目(13ZS144)
关键词 价格涨跌幅限制 证券市场 实验经济学 有效市场假说 price cap and floor limit securities market experimental economics effective market hypothesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1刘海龙,吴文锋,吴冲锋.涨跌幅限制对股票市场波动性的影响[J].上海交通大学学报,2005,39(10):1569-1573. 被引量:12
  • 2阮永平,廖建斌.涨跌幅限制效应与知情投资者行为——中国股票市场的实证研究[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,27(6):7-12. 被引量:2
  • 3《证券监管与新兴经济的成长》,美商业部官员埃弗里特·艾利茨在美国证券交易委员会举办的第15届证券市场发展国际研讨会上的发言,《中国证券报》1996年8月31日
  • 4Andersen T G, Bollerslev T. Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets[ J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1997, (4): 115--158.
  • 5Andersen T G, Bollerslev T. DM-Dollar Volatility: Intraday Activity Patterns, Macroeconomic Announcements, and Longer Run Dependencies[J]. Journal of Finance, 1998, (53) : 219--265.
  • 6Brennan M E. A theory of price limits in futures markets[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, (16) : 213--233.
  • 7Berkman H, Onno W S. The influence of daily price limits on trading in Nikkei futures [ J ]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1998, (18) : 265--279.
  • 8Jagadeesh N, Titman S. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Market Efficiency [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1993, (48): 65--91.
  • 9Fama E F. Perspectives on October 1987, or what did we learn from the crash? [A] In: R. Kampuis, R. Kormendi, & J. Watson (eds.), Black Monday and the Future of Financial Markets[ M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1989.71--82.
  • 10Kuhn B A, Jurserk G J, Locke P. Do circuit breakers moderate volatility? Evidence from October 1989[J]. The Review of Futures Markets, 1991, (10): 136--175.

共引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部