期刊文献+

应用Delphi法建立抗慢性乙型肝炎类药品上市后评价指标体系 被引量:1

Establishment of an Index Evaluation System of the Anti-chronic Hepatitis B Drugs of Post-marketing with Delphi Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:建立一套科学的抗慢性乙型肝炎类药品上市后评价指标体系,为开展抗慢性乙型肝炎类药品上市后再评价提供借鉴。方法:选择陕西省具有副高级及以上职称,在临床医学、药学、传染病学、流行病学和药事管理学等专业工作10年以上的专家50名,应用Delphi法进行两轮专家咨询,对指标进行筛选,根据专家对各指表的赋值情况,运用百分权重法确定各指标权重。结果:两轮调查专家权威系数较高,都在0.7以上;两轮咨询的回收率分别为80%和90%,表明专家积极程度较高;两轮调查专家协调系数分别为0.231,0.314,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),表明专家对所有指标的协调性好,调查结果可取。最终确立7项一级指标,21项二级指标评价体系。结论:专家代表性较强、积极性较高、权威性、协调性较好,初步建立抗慢性乙型肝炎类药品上市后再评价指标体系。 Objective: To build up a set of scientific index evaluation system of the anti-chronic hepatitis B drugs of post-marketing and provide reference for carrying out reevaluation of the anti-chronic hepatitis B drugs of post-marketing. Methods:A total of 50 experts from Shaanxi province with professional academic titles of associate position or above en- gaged in clinical medicine, pharmacology, epidemiology and management for more than ten years were selected, the index system was selected by using the Delphi method and two rounds of expert consultation. According to the evaluation of the experts about each index, the weight of every index was indentifiod at percentage. Results :The expert~ authority coefficient was over 0.7 after two rounds of consultation. The response rates of the two investigation were 80% and 90%, respective- ly, which showed high positive degree of experts. The harmonious coefficient were 0.213 and 0.314, respectively, and had its statistic significance (P 〈 0.01 ). It explained expertsPopinion on the coordination of the overall evaluation bad good in- dication and the findings were advisable. There were 28 index remaining in the final index evaluation system, including 7 index at the first grade and 21 at the second grade. Conclusion:The enthusiasm, authority and harmony of the experts were good. An index evaluation system of the anti-chronic hepatitis B drugs of post-marketing has been set up.
作者 雷丹 剡建华
机构地区 咸阳市中心医院
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2017年第9期600-603,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 DELPHI法 慢性乙型肝炎 指标体系 权重 Delphi method Chronic hepatitis B Index system Weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1王斌,周春美.《人际沟通》教材的编撰及教学策略[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2005,20(4):10-12. 被引量:16
  • 2刘水.浅析护理教育变革与创新性护理教材建设[J].护理研究(中旬版),2006,20(7):1862-1863. 被引量:2
  • 3刘晓红,段志光.护理学本科教材评价存在的问题及对策[J].中华护理教育,2007,4(4):183-184. 被引量:2
  • 4曾光 李辉.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1996.229.
  • 5全国高等医药教材建设研究会、人民卫生出版社专家诲询委员会2006年年会汇编[C].太原:全国高等医药教材建设研究会、卫生部教材办公室、人民卫生出版社,2007:1.
  • 6陆梅华.医院科研绩效评估[D].上海:上海交通大学,2006.
  • 7陈钧.2009年中国PACS发展研究报告[J].中国信息界(e医疗),2009,11:39-51.
  • 8Scholl A,Manthey L,helm R,et cd. Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis:an empirical comparison[J]. Eur J Oper Res ,2005,164(3) :760-777.
  • 9Ijzerman M J ,van Til J A ,Bridges J F. Comparison of analytic hier- archy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation[J]. Patient, 2012,5 ( 1 ) : 45-56.
  • 10Reinhardt U. Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes(COSTS)[J]. Health Eeon,2012,21 (1) :41-54.

共引文献927

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部