期刊文献+

未成年人专业化刑事审判机制实证研究——以四川省泸州市2015年数据为样本

The Empirical Research on the Specialized Criminal Trial Mechanism of Juveniles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以司法行政机关职能协调为视角,针对未成年人专业化刑事审判机制进行实证研究可知,我国少年法庭受理范围规定未区分未成年人轻、重罪案件;对合适成年人应参与而未参与诉讼没有惩戒措施;少年法庭开展判后延伸工作过度;未成年人社会调查实施不统一,调查表设置笼统。应根据实际情况确定少年法庭受案范围;完善公设适当未成年制度和保障机制;各部门协调配合,专门机构统一负责,建立帮教一体的少年犯教育矫正体系;由司法机关牵头,具有专业资质的第三方公益平台组建调查小组实施未成年人社会调查工作。 From the angle of function coordination of the judicial administrative organs, Aiming for the empirical research on the specialized criminal trial mechanism of Juveniles shows that, the acceptance scope of our country’s juvenile courts does not distinguish between misdemeanor and felony cases. If the adult need to participate but do not participate in appropriate adults participation proceedings without disciplinary measures. There are overworks after the juvenile court carried out the trial. The social survey of juveniles is not unified, and the questionnaire is ambiguous. We should determine the case scope of the juvenile court based on the actual situation, improve the system construction and the guarantee mechanism,the coordination of various departments, the unified responsibility of specialized agency, and establish an integrative education correction system of juvenile delinquents. Led by judicial organs, an investigation team should be set up to carry out social investigation for Juveniles conducted by a professional quality of the third party welfare platform.
作者 宋苗
机构地区 四川警察学院
出处 《湖北警官学院学报》 2017年第4期110-115,共6页 Journal of Hubei University of Police
基金 四川省高级人民法院2015年重点调研课题
关键词 未成年人 刑事审判 行政司法机关 少年法庭 合适成年人 教育矫正 Juveniles Criminal Trial Administrative Judicial Organs Juvenile Court Appropriate Adult Education Correction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部