涉机器取财中的被害人同意

The Consent of the Victim in the case of Obtaining Property on the Machine

被害人同意在财产罪解释论中具有重要意义。占有人同意移转占有的,行为人不可能成立盗窃罪;如果同意是基于错误的认知,应考虑行为人是否成立诈骗罪。在ATM机上冒用他人取款卡的,就提取现金而言,由于得到了银行关于占有转移的同意,不成立盗窃罪,应按照信用卡诈骗罪中的"冒用他人信用卡"处理;就转账而言,作为债权人的存款人不可能同意占有的转移,应按照盗窃(债权)处理。在涉机器取财尤其是机器故障案件中,应充分考虑机器设置者是否已将占有转移意志尤其是针对此种故障下取财的反对意志进行客观化表达。

The victim＇s consent has great significance in the interpretation of property crime. The perpetrator can not set up the crime of theft if the occupant agrees the transfer of possession. We should consider whether the perpetrator set up the crime of fraud if the consent is based on a false perception. In the ATM card impersonation case, in terms of cash withdrawal, because the bank has agreed the transfer of possession, the perpetrator can not set up the crime of theft and it should be dealt with in accord- ance with the ＂fraudulent use of other credit cards＂ in credit card fraud. In terms of transfer behavior, because the depositor as a creditor can not consent to the transfer of possession, it should be dealt with in accordance with theft （claims）. In the case of obtaining property on the machine, especially in the case of machine failure, it should be fully considered whether the people who set up machines has expressed this kind of transfer will especially opposing will in view of obtaining property in the case of machine failure objectively.