马克思的近阿多诺阐释——约翰·霍洛威对资本主义批判路径的重构

Near-Adorno Interpretation of Marx

以黑格尔的思维框架来理解马克思,已经在学术界日趋得到反思。目前流行的一些观念,诸如将异质性的生活与斗争还原为"二元对立"的劳动与资本、无产者与资产者的斗争,并最终得到和解,未来那种"好社会"借助"资本自否定"得以达成等观念,正是"黑格尔幽灵"的显现。当意大利自治主义者哈特、奈格里将这些问题的原因铆钉在黑格尔辩证法上时,开放马克思主义代表约翰·霍洛威则试图以阿多诺的否定辩证法介入这场讨论,他分析了黑格尔辩证法是我们思维的"紧身衣"及其所导致的实践偏离,重提阿多诺的"非同一性"的政治哲学意义,并倡导从资本的生产力到"劳动的社会生产力"的转型,以此去寻求资本主义批判与解放的可能。

There is a trend that Marx has been increasingly reflected with Hegelian thinking frame in academia. Some of the prevailing ideas, such as a reduction of heterogeneous life and struggles into ＂dualistic＂ labor and capital, the struggles between the proletarians and the bourgeoisie would finally come to reconciliation. The idea of the future ＂good life＂ by the means of ＂self-denial capital＂ is a presentation of Hegelian ghost. When Hart and Nigel, the Italian self- governmentists, riveted the causes of these problems on Hegelian dialectics, the open Marxist representative John Hollowy was trying to intervene in this discussion with Adorno＇s negative dialectics. Hollowy treated Hegelian dialectics as a unitard and its resulting deviation from the practice. In order to seek the capitalist criticism and the possibility of liberation, Hollowy mentioned the political and philosophical significance of Adorno＇s ＂non-identity＂ and advocated to reach a transformation from the productive forces of capital to ones of labor.