期刊文献+

语用学研究的关系转向——人际语用学:范围、对象与方法 被引量:17

Relational Turn of Pragmatics——Interpersonal Pragmatics: Research Scope,Objectives and Methodology
原文传递
导出
摘要 人际语用学探究交际中语言和非语言方面与人际关系的相互影响和制约。虽然传统语用学的面子、身份、不/礼貌等研究也关涉人际关系,但人际语用学不把语言作为唯一研究对象,探究语言本质,而把关系单独概念化,采用多学科、跨学科视角研究与关系有关联的各种多模态意义符号,因此极大地拓宽语用学研究视域。本文梳理人际语用学的研究范围、对象与方法,旨在为语用学的理论和实践发展提供启发。 Interpersonal pragmatics explores the interpersonal/relational or relating aspects of verbal and nonverbal communication and interaction. Pragmatic studies on face,identity,and(im) politeness have examined interpersonal relations,however,interpersonal pragmatics conceptualizes relations as a distinct concept in its own right. More importantly,it has been shifted away from understanding the nature of language towards understanding of human relations by taking an interdisciplinary approach or a multidisciplinary one. Thus,it greatly broadens the research domain of pragmatics. This paper discusses the research scope,objectives and methodology of interpersonal pragmatics,intending to offer some insights for further development of pragmatics.
作者 刘平
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期20-25,共6页 Foreign Language Research
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"商务语篇中元语用标识语的人际语用学研究"(GD14CWW05)的阶段性成果
关键词 人际语用学 人际关系 后现代视角 interpersonal pragmatics interpersonal relations postmodernism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献102

  • 1王寅.中西学者对体验哲学的论述对比初探[J].外语与外语教学,2004(10):35-40. 被引量:22
  • 2谢朝群,何自然.质疑“礼貌策略说”和“礼貌规范说”[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(3):43-47. 被引量:28
  • 3Andersen, G. &K. Aijmer. 2011. Pragmatics of Society [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 4Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 5Culpeper, J. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in televisions quiz show [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35-72.
  • 6Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7D'hondt, S., J. Ostman & J. Verschueren (eds.). 2009. The Pragmatics of Interaction [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 8Garmendia, J. 2011. Critical pragmatics for explaining errors, lies and ironies [A]. In IPrA (ed.). Abstracts for the 12^th International Pragmatics Conference [C]. Manchester, UK. p.429.
  • 9Giora, R. 1997: Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183-206.
  • 10Giora, R. 2003. On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language [M]. Oxford: OUP.

共引文献164

同被引文献98

引证文献17

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部