期刊文献+

基于差错沟通视角的雇员敌意与员工创新行为:一个有中介的调节效应模型 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经济发展"新常态"下,组织必须通过不断创新来获得和保持竞争优势。本文通过建立雇员敌意、差错沟通、情绪管理和员工创新行为的模型来进行实证研究。研究发现:雇员敌意对员工创新行为有显著的负向影响;差错沟通在雇员敌意对员工创新行为的影响过程起着中介作用;情绪管理正向调节雇员敌意与员工创新行为的负向关系,情绪管理通过抑制雇员敌意对差错沟通的负向效应进而弱化雇员敌意对员工创新行为的负向效应。因此,为促进员工创新行为,企业应重视增强员工的自我情绪管理能力、加强引导,并积极营造正向的差错管理氛围。 As the economy enters a "new normal", constant innovation plays an important role in obtaining and maintaining competitive advantages for organizations. This paper carried out the empirical study by establishing a theoretical model of employee hostility, error communication, emotion regulation and employees" innovative behavior. The result showed that employee hostility had a significant negative influence on innovative behavior; error communication mediates the effects of employee hostility and individual innovative behavior; emotion regulation positively moderates the relationship between employee hostility and individual innovative; emotion regulation attenuated employee hostility's direct negative effect on error communication and indirect negative effect on innovative behavior. From this research, we suggest that in order to promote the innovative behavior of employees, enterprises should enhance the employees" ability of self emotion management, give them more guidance, and actively create a positive error management atmosphere.
出处 《企业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期106-111,共6页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"差错管理氛围对创新行为的跨层次影响:基于创新型企业及其研发人员的实证研究"(项目编号:71372183) 安徽省高等教育振兴计划人才项目"安徽省学术技术带头人培养计划"(项目编号:05201350) 安徽省高等学校省级质量工程项目"名师工作室"(项目编号:2014msgzs129)
关键词 雇员敌意 差错沟通 情绪管理 创新行为 有中介的调节 employee hostility error communication emotion regulation innovative behavior mediated moderation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1黄琳,葛列众.结构限制和信息干扰对双重作业绩效的影响[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):127-131. 被引量:3
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3105
  • 3温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:727
  • 4吴彦文,游旭群.双任务情境下心理旋转的并行加工机制[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):785-794. 被引量:11
  • 5Frese M, Van Dyck C. Error management: Learning from errors and organizational design[C]. Cincinnati Ohio: Poster Presentation of the Academy of Management Con- ference, American Management Association, 1996.
  • 6Van DYCK C, Frese M, Baer M, et al. Organizationa- lerror management culture and its impact on perfor- mance: A two-study replication[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005,90(6):1228-1240.
  • 7Arenas A, Tabemero C, Briones E. Effects of goal orien- tation, error orientation, and self-efficacy on perfor- mance in an uncertain situation[J]. Social Behavior and Personality, 2006,34(5):569-586.
  • 8Amabile T M, Hill K G, Hennessey B A, et al. The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and ex- trinsic motivational orientations[J]. Journal of Personali- ty and Social Psychology, 1994,66(5):950-967.
  • 9Rybowiak V, Grast H, Frese M, et al. Error orientation questionnaire(EOQ): Reliability, vaidity and different language equivalence[J]. Journal of Organizational Be- havior, 1999,20(4):527-547.
  • 10Cigularova K P, Chenb P Y, Rosecrance J. The ef- fects of error management climate and safety commu- nication on safety: A multi-level study[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010(42):1498-1506.

共引文献324

同被引文献82

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部