期刊文献+

犹豫模糊偏好关系一致性改进算法及群决策 被引量:8

Algorithm for Improving the Consistency of Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations and Its Group Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 犹豫模糊偏好关系一致性分析方法是群决策问题中的一个重要课题。基于犹豫模糊偏好关系,对加性一致性、一致性指数、满意一致性进行了定义和度量,研究了加性一致性犹豫模糊偏好关系的若干判定条件,构造了满足加性一致性的特征偏好关系。在此基础上,构建了犹豫模糊偏好关系的加性一致性改进算法,论证了算法的收敛性,该算法使得改进后的犹豫模糊偏好关系满足满意一致性条件,进而使得决策者获得合理可靠的决策结果。最后建立了基于犹豫模糊偏好关系加性一致性的群决策模型,并通过应急管理系统的选择实验说明提出的群决策模型是合理的和有效的。 The consistency analysis method of hesitant fuzzy preference relation (HFPR) is an important issue in group decision making (GDM) problems. In view of the HFPRs, the concepts of additive consistency, consistency index and acceptable consistency of HFPRs are introduced. Then, the determination conditions of additive consistent HFPRs are investigated, and the additive consistent characteristic preference relation is constructed. Based on the characteristic preference relation, a convergent consistency-improving algorithm is proposed to adjust unacceptably additive consistent HFPR into an acceptably additive one, and it helps the decision makers to obtain the reasonable and reliable GDM results. Finally, a GDM model is put forward on the base of the additive consistent HFPR. A practical application to selection of emergency management system is demonstrated to show the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed GDM model.
作者 李宝萍
出处 《控制工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期1829-1837,共9页 Control Engineering of China
基金 国家自然科学基金(71371011 71301001) 安徽省高校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2016A250) 安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SK2017A0586)
关键词 群决策 犹豫模糊偏好关系 加性一致性 特征偏好关系 迭代算法 Group decision making hesitant fuzzy preference relation additive consistency characteristic preference relation iterative algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

  • 1任寅,刘乃丰.基于电子病历的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死临床路径与决策辅助系统[J].现代生物医学进展,2007,7(1):104-107. 被引量:7
  • 2杜栋.AHP判断矩阵一致性问题的数学变换解决方法[A]..决策科学及其应用[C].北京:海洋出版社,1996.99—104.
  • 3王莲芬 许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989.69-76.
  • 4Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980.
  • 5Leigh Kinsman, Tomas Rotter, Erica James, et al. What is clinical pathway. Development of a definition to inform the debate [ J ]. BMC Medicine 2010,15 (8) :31.
  • 6赵艳丽,江志斌,李娜.基于分层赋时着色Petri网的临床路径建模[J].上海交通大学学学报.2010.2.21(2):252-257.
  • 7Wyrwich, Kathleen, Harnarn, et. al. Clinical assessment of risk de- cision support (CARDS) : The development and evaluation of a fea-sible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice Lock- lear [ J ]. Quality of LifeResearch. 2011 , 20 ( 2 ) : 255 -262.
  • 8Benjamin Holler, Dana A. Forgione, et al. Interactive Financial Decision Support for Clinical Research Tri-als. Journal of Health Care Finance ,2011,37 ( 3 ) :25-37.
  • 9程文,吕旭东.基于电子病历的临床决策支持机制与实践[D].浙江:浙江大学.2008.
  • 10Roland Gabriel, Thomas Lux. Modeling and Decision Support of Clinical Pathways [ J ]. Electronic Health-care, 2010,27 ( 6 ) : 147- 154.

共引文献105

同被引文献30

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部