期刊文献+

火电厂协调控制系统的性能评价 被引量:5

Performance Assessment of the Coordinated Control System in Thermal Power Plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于多变量系统的性能评价,论文首先提出了一套完整的基于最小方差基准界的性能评价体系,该体系包括4个最小方差基准界,2个最小方差上界,2个最小方差下界。然后将此应用到火电厂协调控制系统的性能评价中,通过对比不同控制策略下系统的性能,找到了适合于多变量系统的较好控制策略。对比结果表明,自抗扰解耦控制综合了自抗扰控制和解耦补偿器的优点,能更进一步解除变量间的耦合,从而能更进一步提高系统的性能。 Based on the performance assessment of multivariable control systems, a complete theoretical system based on minimum variance benchmark bounds is put forward in this paper. The theoretical system consists of four minimum variance benchmark bounds, two upper bounds and two lower bounds. Then, these minimum variance benchmark bounds are applied to assess the performance of the coordinated control system in thermal power plant. By comparing the performance of different control strategies, the strategy which can improve the performance of the multivariable control system more effectively is found in this paper. Simulation results show that ADRC decoupling control can further remove the coupling between variables, thus improving the performance of the system.
出处 《控制工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期1871-1876,共6页 Control Engineering of China
关键词 性能评价 最小方差基准界 自抗扰控制器 解耦控制 关联矩阵 多变量系统 Performance assessment minimum variance benchmark bound active disturbance rejection controller decoupling control interactor matrix multivariable system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Harris T J. Assessment of control loop performance [J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1989, 67: 856-861.
  • 2Huang B, Shah S L, Kwok K Y. Good, bad or optimal? performance assessment of MIMO processes[J]. Automatica, 1997,33(6): 1175 - 1183.
  • 3Harris T J, Boudreau F, MacGregor J F. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers [J]. Automatica, 1996, 32(11): 1505 - 1518.
  • 4Huang B, Shah S L. The unitary interactor matrix and its estimation from closed-loop data [J]. Journal of Process Control, 1997,7(3): 195-207.
  • 5Kadali R, Huang B. Multivariable control performance assessment without interactor matrix[C] // Proceedings of IFAC Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, Hong Kong, China: [s.n. ],2003:61 -66.
  • 6Ko B S, Edgar T F. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback control systems [J ]. Automatica, 2001, 37(5) : 899- 905.
  • 7McNabb C A, Qin S J. Projection based MIMO control performance monitoring: I-covariance monitoring in state space[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2003, 13(8): 739 - 757.
  • 8Harris T J, Seppala C T, Desborough L D. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems [J]. Journal of Process Control, 1999, 9(1): 1 - 17.
  • 9Kadali R, Huang B, Tamayo E C. A case study on performance analysis and troubling shooting of an industrial model predictive control system[C]//Proceedings of the American Control Conference. San Diego, California, US: [s. n.], 1999: 642-646.
  • 10Shah S L, Patwardhan R, Huang B. Multivariate controller performance assessment : methods, applications and challenges, Chemical Process Control Conperance [R]. Arizona, US: [s.n.], 2002: 190-207.

共引文献14

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部