期刊文献+

基于批判性思维的工程伦理教育研究

Research on Engineering Ethics Education Based on Critical Thinking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球化和信息化时代,现代工程呈现出跨国性的复杂特点,急需加强工程伦理教育,培养工科学生的工程伦理技能。通过文献分析和比较研究,构建工程伦理推理的基本模型,并将科尔伯格的道德发展阶段论引入工程伦理教育分析;提出批判性思维直接决定工程伦理推理能力,影响工科学生道德判断水平,构成工程伦理技能的核心内容;建议将批判性思维列入高等工程教育培养目标,在工程伦理教学中应用批判性思维模型。 In the era of globalization and information,the modern engineering presents lots of complex characteristics,which result in the situation that engineering ethics education is urgently needed to be strengthened and undergraduate student engineering ethical competencies have to be developed. Through the literature analysis and comparative approach,build the engineering ethics reasoning model,and introduces the Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development into the analysis of engineering ethics education.Critical thinking directly determines the ability of engineering ethics reasoning and the level of moral judgment of engineering students,so critical thinkingconstitutes the core content of engineering ethics skills; puts forward the idea of including critical thinking in the training objectives of advanced engineering education,and applies the critical thinking model in the teaching of Engineeringethics.
作者 陈柯蓓 周开发 王雪 CHEN Ke-bei ZHOU Kai-fa WANG Xue(Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, Chin)
机构地区 重庆交通大学
出处 《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》 2017年第5期66-68,共3页 Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
基金 重庆市社会科学规划项目(2015YBZX125) 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(13XJA880008) 重庆市教委人文社科项目(16SKGH074)
关键词 高等工程教育 批判性思维 工程伦理教育 工程伦理推理 Advanced engineering education Critical thinking Engineering ethicseducation Engineering ethics reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1谢笑珍.“大工程观”的涵义、本质特征探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2008,56(3):35-38. 被引量:194
  • 2曾晓牧,孙平,王梦丽,杜慰纯.北京地区高校信息素质能力指标体系研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2006,24(3):64-67. 被引量:128
  • 3Joel Moses, My life, http://esd. mit. edu/Faculty Pages/ moses/moses memoirs, pdf, 284-285.
  • 4Tapscott D. Growing up digital: The rise of the Net Gen- eration[ M ]. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  • 5Schroeder Robert. Merging critical thinking and informa- tion literacy outcomes-making meaning or making strate- gic Partnership [ C]//Carroll Wetzel Wilkinson, Court- ney Bruch. Transforming Information Literacy Programs : Intersecting Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Cam- pus Community Chicago. Association of College and Re- search Libraries,2012 : 131 - 151.
  • 6Ennis Robert H. A concept of critical thinking: A pro- posed basis for research in the teaching and evaluation of critical thinking ability [ J ]. Harvard Educational Re- view,1962(62) :81 - 111.
  • 7Ennis Robert H. A Super-Streamlined Conception of Criti- cal Thinking[ EB/OL]. (2013 - 10 - 17) [2014 - 11 -20]. http ://faculty. education, illinois, edu/rhennis/.
  • 8Facione Peter A. Critical Thinking:A Statement of Ex- pert Consensus for Purpose of Educational Assessment and Instruction, Research Findings and Recommenda- tions[ R]. RIE Report, American Philosophical Associa- tion : Newark Del, 1990.
  • 9Paul Richard, Eider Linda. Critical thinking:The art of socratic questioning [ J ]. Journal of Developmental Edu- cation ,2007,31, ( 1 ) : 36 - 37.
  • 10American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report 1989 [ R/OL ]. [2014 -01 - 14 ]. http ://www. ala. org/ala/mgrps/di- vs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential, cfm.

共引文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部