期刊文献+

实时剪切波弹性成像评价肝纤维化分级的Meta分析 被引量:10

Value of real-time shear wave elastography in evaluating classification of liver fibrosis: a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用Meta分析评价实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)技术对肝纤维化分级的诊断价值。方法对2010年1月-2016年12月Pubmed、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普和万方等数据库中有关SWE评价肝纤维化分级的中、英文文献进行筛选和评价,应用Meta-disc 1.4软件对入选文献各项数据进行整合分析。结果共纳入11篇英文文献,总病例数为1560例。SWE对≥F2组的合并敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比(DOR)分别为0.85[95%可信区间(95%CI):0.82~0.87]、0.79(95%CI:0.76~0.82)、30.81(95%CI:16.55~57.34);≥F3组的合并敏感度、特异度、DOR分别0.87(95%CI:0.84~0.91)、0.84(95%CI:0.82~0.87)、41.45(95%CI:18.25~94.45);F4组的合并敏感度、特异度、DOR分别0.88(95%CI:0.83~0.91)、0.91(95%CI:0.89~0.92)、67.18(95%CI:30.03~150.31)。3组的曲线下面积分别为0.914 7、0.922 3和0.952 0。结论 SWE技术对判断肝纤维化分级具有较高的诊断价值,在临床上可用于肝纤维化分期。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of real-time shear wave elastography( SWE) technique in evaluating classification of liver fibrosis. Methods Pub Med,CNKI,CBM,VIP,and Wanfang Data were searched for Chinese and English articles on SWE for evaluating classification of liver fibrosis published from January 2010 to December 2016,and these articles were screened and evaluated.Meta-disc 1. 4 software was used for the meta-analysis of the data in the articles included. Results A total of 11 English articles were included,with 1560 cases in total. In the ≥F2 group,SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 85( 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0. 82-0. 87),a specificity of 0. 79( 95% CI: 0. 76-0. 82),and a diagnostic odds ratio( DOR) of 30. 81( 95% CI: 16. 55-57. 34). In the ≥F3 group,SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 87( 95% CI: 0. 84-0. 91),a specificity of 0. 84( 95% CI: 0. 82-0. 87),and a DOR of 41. 45( 95%CI: 18. 25-94. 45). In the F4 group,SWE had a pooled sensitivity of 0. 88( 95% CI: 0. 83-0. 91),a specificity of 0. 91( 95% CI: 0. 89-0. 92),and a DOR of 67. 18( 95% CI: 30. 03-150. 31). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for these three groups were 0. 914 7,0. 922 3,and 0. 952 0,respectively. Conclusion SWE has a high diagnostic value in evaluating the classification of liver fibrosis and can be used to determine liver fibrosis stage in clinical practice.
作者 吴越 黄丽萍 WU Yue HUANG Liping.(Department of Ultrasound, Shengfing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China)
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 2017年第9期1717-1721,共5页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
关键词 肝硬化 弹性成像技术 META分析 liver fibrosis elasticity imaging techniques Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

  • 1闫国珍,段云友,阮骊韬,杨一林,曹铁生.无创定量超声积分与肝纤维化程度关系的实验研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(9):701-704. 被引量:8
  • 2周光德,赵景民,丁效蕙,潘登,孙艳玲,杨建法,赵雨来.基于NASH-CRN方案的130例非酒精性脂肪性肝病病理研究[J].解放军医学杂志,2007,32(2):96-99. 被引量:6
  • 3张文胜,王宝恩,贾继东,欧晓娟,王泰龄,钱林学,张福奎,马红,尤红.超声综合评估系统诊断慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2007,15(4):249-253. 被引量:29
  • 4Glasziou P,Irwig L,Bain C,et al.Systematic reviews in health care:A practical guide.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2001.
  • 5Decks J.Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.In:Systematic Reviews in Health Care:Metaanalysis in context Edited by:Egger M,Davey Smith G,Altman D.London:BMJ Publishing Group;2001.Second edition.
  • 6Whiting P,Rutjes A,Dinnes J,et al.A systematic review of existing quality assessment tools used to assess the quality of diagnostic research submitted.
  • 7Streiner DL,Norman GR.Health measurement scales:a practical guide to their development and use.Oxford:Oxford University Press 1995.
  • 8Jadad AR,Moore A,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials,1996,17:1-12.
  • 9Juni P,Altman DG,Egger M.Assessing the quality of controlled trals.BMJ,2001,323:42-46.
  • 10Juni P,Witschi A.Bloch Rmet al.The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analvsis.JAMA.1999,282:1054-1060.

共引文献144

同被引文献99

引证文献10

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部