护理干预在预防孕产妇围术期感染中的应用价值分析

Application of Value of Nursing Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Infection of Pregnant Women

目的探讨护理干预在预防孕产妇围术期感染中的应用价值。方法选取我院自2015年5月15日—2016年5月15日收治112例孕产妇作为研究对象。采用奇偶数分组模式,常规组采用一般护理,实验组加强围术期护理干预,对比两组患者的护理效果。结果实验组与常规组的感染发生率分别为16.07%与44.64%,组间对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组与常规组的高热发生率分别为23.21%与48.21%,组间对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组与常规组高热持续时间分别为(35.62±8.54)h与(50.68±10.85)h,组间对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组与常规组的护理满意度分别为94.64%与78.57%,组间对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对孕产妇加强围术期护理干预措施,便于有效控制感染、高热等的发生率,进一步提高临床护理质量。

Objective To explore the value of nursing intervention in prevention of perioperative infection in pregnant women. Methods From May 15, 2015 to May 15, 2015, 112 cases of pregnant women were divided with odd and even grouping model. Among them, the general group was treated with general care, and the perioperative nursing intervention was strengthened in the experimental group. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of infection was 16.07% and 44.64% in the experimental group and the conventional group respectively, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. The incidence of hyperthermia was 23.21% and 48.21% in the experimental group and the conventional group respectively, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. The duration of high fever in the experimental group and the routine group was （35.62 4- 8.54） h and （50.68 4- 10,85） h respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）; The satisfaction degree of nursing between the experimental group and the routine group was 94.64% and 78.57% respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Perioperative nursing for pregnant women can he used to control the incidence of infection and fever, and to further improve the quality of clinical care.