摘要
《理想国》第一卷始终围绕着"究竟正义是什么"的问题展开了辩论。无论是对于克法洛斯"欠债还债就是正义",玻勒马霍斯"正义就是益友损敌",还是色拉叙马霍斯"正义就是强者的利益"的观点,苏格拉底都可以提出他自己的说辞。整体看来,通过苏格拉底与玻勒马霍斯的辩论,苏格拉底的立场在柏拉图的笔墨下体现得淋漓尽致。
A debate on “ what＇s exactly justice” was carried out in chapter one of The Republic. On critici-zing the three views, namely,4to be paid what is owed is justice＇ by Cephalus,4justice is benefiting friends and causing enemies＂ loss” by Bo Lema Hoss and“ justice is overmatches profit”）y Salad Mahos, Socrates could al-ways present his own proposals. In summary, through the debate between Socrates and Bo Lema Hoss, the stand of Socrates was vividly described by Plato.
出处
《大庆师范学院学报》
2017年第5期6-9,共4页
Journal of Daqing Normal University
