期刊文献+

三种混合制冷剂循环液化天然气的比功耗和对比 被引量:2

Comparison of Unit Power Consumption and Exergy for Mixed Refrigerants Cycle to LNG
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对利用混合制冷剂循环液化天然气技术能降低循环功耗及提高?效率的特点,通过建立模拟的无预冷混合制冷剂循环、三级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环和单级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环3种天然气液化模型,在一定约束条件下模拟计算液化过程压缩机的比功耗、损失及制冷剂流量,对比分析压缩机的比功耗和损失。结果表明:无预冷混合制冷剂循环的比功耗和损失量都是最大的,其比功耗分别是三级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环的7.28倍、单级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环的7.23倍,其损失量是三级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环的10.74倍、单级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环的10.62倍;但单级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环较三级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环有流程更简单、更便于维护的优势。因此应优先选用单级丙烷预冷混合制冷剂循环液化流程。 The technology of mixed refrigerant cycle to LNG may not only reduce power consumption but also improve exergy efficiency. So, three models of liquefaction process were developed, including mixed refrigerant cycle without pre-cooling, and singlestage and three-stage propane-precooled mixed refrigerants cycle.Under the condition of certain constraints, these models were used to simulate and calculate the unit power consumption, exergy loss,and refrigerant flow of the air compressor. Furthermore, unit power consumption and exergy loss were analyzed. Results show that(1)for the mixed refrigerant cycle without pre-cooling, its unit power consumption and exergy loss are the biggest ones among these of single-stage and three-stage propane-precooled mixed refrigerants cycle 7.28 times and 10.74 times of three-stage one, and 7.23 times and 10.62 times of one-stage one, individually; and(2)single-stage one is superior to three-stage one owing to simpler process and more easy maintenance. In general, the single-stage propane-precooled mixed refrigerant cycle should be optimally selected.
出处 《天然气技术与经济》 2017年第4期54-57,共4页 Natural Gas Technology and Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:51276029) 辽宁科技工程项目(编号:2012219024)的部分内容
关键词 天然气液化流程 无预冷混合制冷剂 丙烷预冷混合制冷剂 比功耗 㶲损失 liquefaction process mixed refrigerant without precooling propane-precooled mixed refrigerant unit power consumption exergy loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈国邦,余建平,黄志秀,郑建耀.天然气液化技术及其应用[J].深冷技术,1995(5):1-7. 被引量:8
  • 2郑大振.现代调峰LNG工厂及其流程选型比较[J].低温与特气,1995,13(1):1-7. 被引量:5
  • 3曹文胜,鲁雪生,顾安忠,汪荣顺.小型撬装式LNG装置的流程模拟[J].化工学报,2006,57(6):1290-1295. 被引量:31
  • 4Cao Wensheng, Lu Xuesheng, Lin Wensheng, et al. Parameter comparison of two small-scale natural gas liquefaction processes in skidmounted packages [ J ]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006 (26) : 898 -904.
  • 5Remeljeja C W, Hoadley A F A. An exergy analysis of small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) liquefaction processes [ J ]. Energy, 2006, (31): 2005-2019.
  • 6Finn A J, Johnson G L, Tomlinson T R. Development in natural gas liquefaction [J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 1999, (6):47-59.
  • 7Terry L. Comparison of liquefaction process [ J]. LNG Journal, 1998, 21 (3) : 28-33.
  • 8Johnson G L, Finn A J, Tomlinson T R. Offshore and smaller scale liquefiers [ J]. LNG Journal , 1999, (July-August) : 19-22.
  • 9Shi Yumei (石玉美).The thermodynamic research of the mixed refrigerant cycle to liquefied naturar gas[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University,1998.
  • 10Zhu Gang (朱国).Study on transport properties of natural gas and optimization on liquefaction processes of LNG peakshaving plants[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2000.

共引文献62

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部