期刊文献+

表观弥散系数和各向异性值对脑出血术后疗效的预测价值

Predictive value of apparent dispersion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in the treatment of postoperative hemorrhage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究表观弥散系数(ADC)和各向异性值(FA)对脑出血患者术后疗效的预测价值。方法回顾性分析76例在延安市人民医院神经外科就诊并进行手术治疗的脑出血患者,按照预后是否良好分为预后良好组和预后不良组,采用磁共振弥散张量成像(DTI)检测脑出血术后2周内所有受试对象的ADC和FA值,分析ADC、FA对脑出血术后的预测价值。结果脑出血手术清除率达到82.9%。Logistic回归分析显示,ADC、FA、糖尿病、高血压病为脑出血患者术后预后的影响因素。FA值诊断手术预后的曲线下面积为0.804(95%CI:0.710~0.899),ADC为0.771(95%CI:0.669-0.872),而ADC+FA诊断脑出血术后的曲线下面积为0.872(95%CI:0.791~0.953)。结论ADC和FA对脑出血术后疗效的预测具有一定的临床价值。 Objective To investigate the predictive value of apparent dispersion coefficient(ADC) and fractional anisotropy(FA) in the treatment of postoperative hemorrhage. Methods Totals of 76 patients who underwent neurosurgical treatment of cerebral hemorrhage in Department of Neurosurgery, Yan' an People' s Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group according to their prognosis. The ADC and FA values of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were measured by magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. The predictive value of ADC and FA in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage was analyzed. Results The rate of cerebral hemorrhage eliminating was 82.9%. Logistic regression analysis showed that ADC, FA, diabetes mellitus and hypertension were prognostic factors of postoperative cerebral hemorrhage. The area under the curve of FA diagnosed cerebral hemorrhage was 0.804 (95%CI: 0.710-0.899), ADC was 0.771(95%CI: 0.669-0.872), while ADC+FA was 0.872(95%CI: 0.791-0.953). Conclusions ADC and FA have certain clinical values in predicting the curative effect of cerebral hemorrhage.
作者 张永兵
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2017年第7期488-491,共4页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
关键词 脑出血 弥散加权成像 表观弥散系数 各向异性值 疗效 Cerebral hemorrhage DWI ADC FA Treatment efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献71

  • 1杨帆,申明峰,姚宏伟,陈轩.脑室内积血患者脑室灌注尿激酶剂量和时间的探讨[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(22):6618-6621. 被引量:9
  • 2Beom Kyung Kim,James Fung,Man-Fung Yuen,Seung Up Kim.Clinical application of liver stiffness measurement using transient elastography in chronic liver disease from longitudinal perspectives[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(12):1890-1900. 被引量:15
  • 3Kundra V, Silverman P M, Matin S F, et al. Imaging in oncolo- gy from the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of prostate cancer[J]. AJR, 2007,189(4): 830-844.
  • 4McNeal J E,Redwine E A,Freiha F S,et al. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma, correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1988,12 ( 12 ) : 897 - 906.
  • 5Desouza N M, Reinsberg S A, Scurr E D, et al. Magnetic reso- nance imaging in prostate cancer: the value of apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules [J]. Br J Radiol, 2007,80 (950): 90- 95.
  • 6Gibbs P, Pickles M D, Turnbull L W. Repeatability of echo-pla- nar-based diffusion measurements of the human prostate at 3 T [J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2007,25 (10) :1423- 1429.
  • 7Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, et al. Prostate cancer differentia tion of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR ima- ging[J]. Radiology, 2010, 257(3) :715-723.
  • 8Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in periph- eral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantita- tive dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T[J]. Acta Radiol,2014,55(2) :239-247.
  • 9Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Sciarra A, et al. In vivo 3D neuroan- atomical evaluation of periprostatic nerve plexus with 3T-MR diffusion tensor imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013,82 (10) : 1677 - 1682.
  • 10Finley D S, Ellingson B M, Natarajan S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance tractography of the prostate: feasibility for mapping periprostatic fibers [J]. Urology, 2012,80 ( 1 ) : 219 - 223.

共引文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部