摘要
对4种典型类型的体育犯罪进行分析,认为刑法不得已原则的法理标准和情理标准在准确判定体育犯罪刑法边界问题上卓有成效。故意伤害是竞技体育伤害罪与非罪的分水岭;自服和骗服兴奋剂是合理区分自损行为和刑事伤害的标准;是否合法买卖、运输、制造兴奋剂是当否判定非法经营罪的基础;公职资格是"假球""黑哨"定性受贿罪的遵循标准;赌球发起的非法性是非法经营罪成立的实质依据,亦是裁量赌球个人投注无罪的前提。
The study analyzed 4 typical sport crimes,holding that the legal standard and emotion standard of necessity principle in criminal law could effectively determine the boundary of criminal law for sport. Intentional injury or not is the division betw een guilty and not-guilty in sport; and taking dope consciously or unconsciously can determine the self-injury or criminal injury.Thirdly,the legal trading,transporting or producing dope or not is the basis for the judgment of crime of illegal business operations;and the qualification of public employment or not is the criteria of taking bribes in "fake ball " or"black w histle ". Lastly,gabling behavior of the originators is the basis for the judgment of illegal business operation crime,as w ell as the verdict presupposition of not-guilty for individual gambling.
出处
《上海体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期57-63,共7页
Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基金
国家社会科学基金资助青年项目(16CFX025)
关键词
体育犯罪
刑法边界
不得已原则
标准
sport crime
the boundary of criminal law
necessity principle
standard