期刊文献+

政府与大学关系变革:芬兰、瑞典及比利时三国建设世界一流大学的经验 被引量:6

On the Reform of Relation Change between Governments and Universities:the Experiences from Finland,Sweden and Belgium in the Construction of WCUs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用比较分析法研究发现,为形成政府控制与大学自治的平衡,芬兰、瑞典及比利时三国政府在建设世界一流大学进程中,通过高等教育改革、培育中介组织、完善法律体系等方式弱化政府对大学的直接控制,积极扩展大学的办学自主权,这为赫尔辛基大学、乌普萨拉大学及荷兰语天主教鲁汶大学成为世界一流大学创造了有利的外部环境。从三国政府与大学关系变革的绩效来看,虽然大学的自主办学权已经得到了有效落实,但政府作为大学的出资者与管理者仍然对大学保留有较大的影响力。政府通过中央教育行政机构以合同形式管理大学事务,建立协商互动的"政府—大学"良性关系,并以加强对大学教育质量的有效评估等手段强化对大学的间接干预。 This paper uses a comparative analysis and finds that in order to form a bal- ance between government control and university autonomy, Finish, Swedish and Belgian governments have undertaken the reform of higher education in the construction of WCUs by cultivating intermediary organizations, improving the legal system and weakening the di- rect control of governments in recent years. The outcome of the reform for the relationship between governments and universities of these three countries is obviously positive and uni- versities have effectively obtained autonomy from the governments. Nevertheless, it also can find from the reform that although the university autonomy has effectively increased, these three countries" governments still have greater influences on universities. Governments from those three countries attempt to establish positive relationship with universities on the basis of performance-agreement, communication, negotiation and evaluation. Governments also attempt to strengthen the effective evaluation of the quality of university education and which leads to indirect intervention.
作者 刘路 刘志民
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期13-25,共13页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 中国高教学会"十二五"教育科学规划课题"高校办学自主权落实问题研究"(课题批准号:11YB092) 南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科资助项目"世界一流大学建设的路径与战略选择"(项目编号:SKGL2017001)
关键词 世界一流大学 政府 自治 变革 芬兰 瑞典 比利时 WCUs Government Autonomy Reform Finland Sweden Belgium
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

  • 1马丁.英斯,冯李崟,钟周.国际化视角下的德国“卓越计划”[J].清华大学教育研究,2009,30(3):6-11. 被引量:24
  • 2付艳.韩国“BK21计划”初探[J].江西教育(管理版)(A),2008,0(28):41-42. 被引量:1
  • 3徐小洲,郑英蓓.韩国的世界一流大学发展计划:BK21工程[J].高等工程教育研究,2006,54(6):99-104. 被引量:16
  • 4顾海兵.高校“近亲繁殖”之弊[N].2l世纪经济报道,2006-07-31.
  • 5VERHOEVEN J C & DOM L. (2002) Flemish Eurydice Report 2001.. Education Policy and Education Organisation in Flanders. Brussels: Ministry of the Flemish Community, Education Department, Education Policy Coordination Division.
  • 6BROWN P, HALSEY A H, LAUDER H & WELLS A S. (1996)"The transformation of education and society, an introduction. In Halsey A H , LAUDER H , BROWN P AND WELLS A S. (eds.) Education: culture, economy and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 1-44.
  • 7CHEVAILLIER T. (2002) "University governance and finance, the impact of changes in resource allocation on decision making structures" in, AMARAL A , JONES G A & KARSETH B. (eds) Governing Higher Education. National Perspectives on Institutional Governance Dordrecht, Boston, London : Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 87-98.
  • 8CHEVAILLIER, T. (1998) "Moving away from central planning: using contracts to steer higher education in France', European Journal of Education, 33 (1) : 65-76.
  • 9DE WIT K & VERHOEVEN J C (2003) Conditional autonomy. Governmental Policy on Higher Education and the Economy in Flanders. in. P. Maassen (ed) Higher Education and Economy in Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press (forthcoming).
  • 10EURYDICE (2000-2001) "Le systeme educatif fran? ais, Eurybase 2001 : The information database on education systems in Europe. (http://www. eurydice. org/Eurybase/Application/frameset. asp? country=FR&language= VO; 15 August 2003).

共引文献65

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部