期刊文献+

单侧与双侧微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较 被引量:5

Clinical application of MIS-TLIF combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar degenerative disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MIS-TLIF)手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病过程中,应用单侧椎弓根钉固定的优势。方法回顾性分析自2012-08-2014-08采用MIS-TLIF技术治疗的腰椎退行性疾病70例,其中单侧椎弓根钉固定38例,双侧固定32例,术后随访23-41个月,平均28.6个月。对两组的围手术期指标、手术前后VAS、ODI评分和并发症、椎间融合情况进行对比。结果单侧组手术时间明显短于双侧组,且术中出血量和术后引流量均明显少于双侧组(P<0.05);两组术后的VAS、ODI评分改善情况,以及并发症发生率、椎间融合率均较为相近(P>0.05)。结论在MIS-TLIF术中联合单侧与双侧椎弓根钉固定的疗效相近,但单侧固定的手术创伤更小,术中出血量更少,可优先选择。 Objective To explore the advantage of application of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgical in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 70 cases with lumbar degenerative disease who were treated by MIS-TLIF from August 2012 to August 2014, including unilateral pediele screw fixation in 38 cases, 32 cases of bilateral fixation. The patients were followed up for 23-41 months after operation, an average of 28.6 months. The perioperative indicators, VAS, ODI scores, complications and interbody fusion were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of unilateral group was significantly shorter than the bilateral group, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage of unilateral group were significantly less than those of the bilateral group (P〈0.05). The postoperative VAS and:ODI scores, and the ~incidence of complications, fusion rate of two groups were similar (P〉0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in MIS-TLIF is similar, but the operation of unilateral fixation has less trauma, and less blood loss.
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2017年第5期435-438,共4页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 腰椎退行性疾病 微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合手术 单侧椎弓根钉内固定 lumbar degenerative disease minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion unilateral pedicle screw fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献60

  • 1马冠生,李艳平,武阳丰,翟凤英,崔朝辉,胡小琪,栾德春,胡永华,杨晓光.1992至2002年间中国居民超重率和肥胖率的变化[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(5):311-315. 被引量:247
  • 2李超,干阜生,张以恺,赵致良,张和福.两侧对称性开窗减压治疗中央型腰椎间盘突出症[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1996,11(3):182-184. 被引量:9
  • 3谭俊铭,叶晓健,贾连顺,李家顺.腰椎融合术的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):397-399. 被引量:21
  • 4梅铭惠,陈谦,杨景红,徐静,邱维加,曾思恩,唐建华.肝癌合并门静脉癌栓的临床病理分级及意义[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(6):374-377. 被引量:16
  • 5李慧友,朱青安,李桂兰,钟世镇,卢海俊,李忠华.单侧小关节分级切除对腰椎稳定性影响的三维运动研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1996,6(5):206-209. 被引量:24
  • 6Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stage procedure in operative treatment of spondylolisthesis:dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion[in German][J]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1982, 120(3): 343-347.
  • 7Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion[J]. Spine, 2003, 28(15 Suppl): $26-35.
  • 8Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2013 Jan 12. [Ahead of Print].
  • 9Wang J, Zhou Y, Feng Zhang Z, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2012, May 17. [Ahead of Print].
  • 10Tian NF, Wu YS, Zhang XL, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence[J]. Eur Spine J,2013, 22(8): 1741-1749.

共引文献119

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部