期刊文献+

美国商业判断规则的理论与实践 被引量:1

The Theory and Practice of American Business Judgment Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商业判断规则是肇始于十九世纪的一项判断董事责任的基本规则,其在司法实践中的适用已经日臻成熟。文章认为商业判断原则不是通过各因素逐一判断董事行为是否符合注意义务的实质判断标准,而是用来反对法院随意通过司法手段审查注意义务的一个基本假定。这种假定认为,除非原告可以预先证明董事等公司管理人员违反了商业判断规则中的"善意"假设,否则法院不能对其决策行为进行实质性审查。从我国对待商业判断规则应有的态度来看,我国应通过立法与指导案例并存的形式,积极引入商业判断规则,并对董事信义义务加以规定,以进一步完善我国的董事责任体系,促进市场经济的发展。 Business judgment rule is a basic rule about the liability of directors,which dates back to nineteenth century.And its application in judicial practice has become increasingly mature recently. The paper argued that business principles is not a substance criterion about judging whether the behavior of a director conforms to the duty of care through various factors,but a basic assumption against the random judicial review about duty of care. This assumption argued that court cannot conduct a substantive review of its decision-making unless the plaintiff can pre-prove that the directors and other managers of the company violate the " goodwill" assumption in the business judgment rules. From the attitude of our country to treat the rules of commercial judgment,China should actively introduce the rules of commercial judgment through the form of coexistence of legislation and guidance case,and stipulate the directors 'duty of faith to further improve the system of directors' responsibility and promote the development of market economy.
作者 靳丽曼
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《贵州商学院学报》 2017年第3期33-39,共7页 Journal of Guizhou University Of Commerce
关键词 商业判断规则 实质责任标准 司法审查回避原则 董事责任 Business Judgment Rules the Standard of Substantial Liability Principle of Judicial Review Avoidance Director's Responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1方流芳.民事诉讼收费考[J].中国社会科学,1999(3):130-153. 被引量:185
  • 2蔡元庆.股东代表诉讼中公司的地位和作用 以美国特别诉讼委员会制度为中心[J].中外法学,2006,18(4):448-461. 被引量:14
  • 3胡晓静.德国股东派生诉讼制度评析[J].当代法学,2007,21(2):136-142. 被引量:25
  • 4[美]理查德·A·波斯纳 蒋兆康译.《法律的经济分析》(下)[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年版.第551页.
  • 5Arad Reisberg. Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance: Theory and Operation[ M . Oxford University Press,2007.
  • 6王卓铭.小股东诉三联集团立案国美逼宫筹码或增[N].21世纪经济报道,2009-12-11(14).
  • 7Klein & Coffee. Business Organization and Finance:Legal and Economic Principles(10th) [ M 1. Thomson/West Group, 2007.
  • 8[美]美国法学会.公司治理原则:分析与建议(下卷)[M].楼建波,陈炜恒,等译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
  • 9Janet Cooper Alexander. Contingent Fees and Class Actions[ J. 47 Depaul L. Rev. 1997 -1998.
  • 10Zhong Zhang. Making Shareholder Derivative Actions Happen in China: How Should Lawsuits be Funded? [ J . Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 38,2008.

共引文献15

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部