期刊文献+

新型解剖型纳米笼架在腰椎前路椎间融合中的应用 被引量:6

Application of a novel anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage in XLIF/OLIF surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨解剖型纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎间融合器腰椎前路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的初步临床疗效。[方法]2014年2月~2016年2月本院收治23例腰椎退行性疾病患者,采用解剖型纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎间融合器斜向腰椎前路椎间融合术治疗。其中男10例,女13例;年龄51~64岁,平均54.20岁。腰椎间盘突出症13例,退变性腰椎滑脱7例,峡部裂性腰椎滑脱3例;观察手术时间、术中出血量及并发症发生情况,影像学观察椎间隙高度及植骨融合情况,以视觉疼痛模拟评分(VAS)和JOA评分评估临床效果。[结果]23例手术时间40~190 min,平均90 min;术中出血量30~120 ml,平均50 ml;全部病例随访8~26个月,平均18个月。随访期间1例发生术后屈髋和腰大肌无力,予以营养神经等保守治疗3周后症状缓解。余无内固定等相关并发症发生。椎间隙高度由术前平均(5.94±1.25)mm改善至末次随访的(9.58±1.27)mm。术后6个月时椎间植骨融合率91.70%,术前及末次随访腰痛VAS评分分别为(7.21±1.17)分、(0.73±0.69)分,腿痛VAS评分分别为(7.32±1.29)分、(0.79±0.58)分,JOA评分分别为(14.12±2.11)分、(27.42±1.32)分。[结论]解剖型纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎间融合器腰椎前路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病初步临床应用疗效满意且并发症发生率低,可以作为腰椎退行性疾病的治疗方式之一。 [Objective] To evaluate the preliminary clinical outcomes of anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage in extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) / oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery. [Method] From February 2014 to February 2016, 23 patients suffering degenerative lumbar disc diseases underwent XLIF/OLIF surgery with anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cages. The patients included 10 males and 13 females with an average age of 54.2 years, ranging from 51 to 64 years. Of them, 13 patients were diagnosed of lumbar disc herniation, 7 of degenerative spondylolisthesis and 3 of isthmic spondylolisthesis. The operative time, blood loss and complications were recorded, and the fusion rate was determined by radiographic assessment. Additionally, visual analogue score (VAS) and JOA score were used for clinical outcome assessment. [Result] The operation lasted for 90 minutes on average (range, 40-190 minutes) with intraoperative blood loss of 50 ml on average (range, 30-120 ml). After surgery, all patients were followed up for 8 to 26 months with a mean of 18 mouths. No complication occurred except for 1 case of leg pain after operation, who relieved after 3 weeks of conservative treatment. The intervertebral disc height significantly increased from (5.94± 1.25) mm preoperatively to (9.58 ± 1.27) mm at final follow-up (P〈0.05) . The intervertebral fusion rate was 91.7% at 6 months after operation. The VAS score of low back pain significantly decreased from (7.21±1.17) before operation to (0.73±0.69) at the final follow-up (P〈0.05) , similarly, VAS of leg pain remarkably reduced from (7.32± 1.29) preoperatively to (0.79±0.58) at the latest follow up (P〈 0.05) . In addition, the JOA score significantly increased form (14.12±2.11 ) preoperatively to (27.42±1.32) at the final follow-up (P〈0.05) . [Conclusion] For treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases, anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage is an effective implant to improve interbody fusion in XLIF/OLIF surgery.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第19期1735-1740,共6页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 解剖型纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎间融合器 腰椎前路椎间融合术 腰椎退行性疾病 anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage, extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) , oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) , degenerative lumbar diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, et al. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21 (5): 785-793.
  • 2Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B, et al, Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease [J]. Spine, 2015, 40 (3): E175-182.
  • 3Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fu- sion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting Peripheral Nerves, March 2004 1(1): 24-30. on Disorders of the Spine and [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004,.
  • 4Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007, 15(6): 321- 329.
  • 5Shen FH, Samartzis D, Khanna AJ, et al. Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2007, 38(3): 373-386.
  • 6Hu WK, He SS, Zhang SC, et al. An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach [J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(4): 557-562.
  • 7Moiler D J, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr, et al. Minimally inva- sire lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach- related morbidity[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2011, 31(4): E4.
  • 8Youssef .IA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, et al. Minimally invasive surgery.: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review [J]. Spine, 2010, 35(26 Suppl): $302-311.
  • 9Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral inter- body fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique fi~r anterior lumbar inter-body fusion [J]. Spine J, 2006, 6(4): 435-443.
  • 10Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, et al. Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015Aug 6. [Epub ahead of print].

共引文献11

同被引文献76

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部