摘要
结合某实际工程对比了YJK和Etabs对分别布置有屈曲约束钢板墙和非线性黏滞流体阻尼器的混凝土框架结构的弹性时程分析结果。可知,当结构布置有屈曲约束钢板墙时,YJK和Etabs弹性时程分析结果相差较大,尤其是滞回曲线差异明显;当结构布置有非线性黏滞流体阻尼器时,YJK和ETabs弹性时程分析结果相差较小,几乎一致。
The article compares the elastic time - history analysis results of YJK and Etabs by a practical engineering, it can be concluded that when the structure is arranged buckling restrained wall the elastic timehistory analysis results of YJK and Etabs have larger differences, especially the hysteretic loop, when the structure has nonlinear viscous fluid damper, the results are almost the same.
出处
《佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
2017年第5期719-722,共4页
Journal of Jiamusi University:Natural Science Edition
关键词
屈曲约束钢板墙
非线性黏滞流体阻尼器
弹性时程分析
buckling restrained wall
nonlinear viscous fluid damper
elastic time -history analysis